Harris & Becerra v. Shine

Docket NumberA148505
Decision Date23 October 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • Chen v. Valstock Ventures, LLC
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 2022
    ...probate and family law, which are governed by different statutes and considerations. (See, e.g., People ex rel. Harris & Becerra v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 533–534, 224 Cal.Rptr.3d 380 [discussing principle of interim fee awards in litigation concerning a trust estate]; Alan S. v. ......
  • Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • February 26, 2018
    ...the trial court's written orders and all the evidentiary materials germane to Appellants' motion. (See People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 533, 224 Cal.Rptr.3d 380 [no reporter's transcript of motion hearing was necessary on appeal where the "arguments on appeal do not......
  • Coyne v. De Leo
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 30, 2018
    ...when it applies the wrong legal standards. [Citation.] We decide questions of law de novo." ( People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 534, 224 Cal.Rptr.3d 380.)De Leo argues the purchase contract, note, and deed of trust were sham agreements that did not, in substance, alt......
  • Menlo v. Klein
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 20, 2018
    ..." (Whittlesey, supra, 104 Cal.App.4th at p. 1230; Conservatorship of Lefkowitz (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1314; People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 534; Butler v. LeBouef (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 198, 213.) The "trustee may use trust funds to pay for legal advice regard......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Mcle Self-study Article Trustee's Obligation to Maintain Impartiality in Trust Litigation: Zahnleuter v. Mueller (2023) 88 Cal.app.5th 1294
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Trusts & Estates Quarterly (CLA) No. 29-4, July 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...duty to take reasonable steps to enforce claims that are part of the trust property). 58. People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 535 (if trustee has successfully defended against removal or surcharge, trustee can be reimbursed from the trust for fees used in that successf......
  • Mcle Self-study Article Roadblocks on the Road to Probate Trials
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Trusts & Estates Quarterly (CLA) No. 28-4, June 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...supra, 63 Cal.App.5th at p. 426.130. Dunlap v. Mayer, supra, (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th at p. 427.131. People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524, 539 (citing Schwartz v. Labow, supra, 164 Cal.App.4that pp. 427-28).132. See Dunlap v. Mayer, supra, 63 Cal.App.5th at p. 427 ("There w......
  • When Is Enough, Enough? Judicial Trustee Removal and Trolan v. Trolan (2019) 31 Cal.app.5th 939
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Trusts & Estates Quarterly (CLA) No. 27-1, January 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...of the trust.").58. People ex rel. Becerra v. Shine (Feb. 19, 2020 A155903) 2020 WL 812955; People ex rel. Harris v. Shine (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 524.59. People ex rel. Becerra v. Shine, supra, WL 812955 at *6.60. Id.61. Estate of Moore (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 1101, 1105.62. Prob. Code, secti......