Harris N.A. v. Acadia Invs. L.C.

Docket Number11-1550
Decision Date29 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
167 cases
  • Miksis ex rel. Miksis v. Evanston Twp. High Sch. Dist. # 202
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • January 27, 2017
    ...mere scintilla of evidence" and come forward with "specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial." Harris N.A. v. Hershey , 711 F.3d 794, 798 (7th Cir. 2013). Ultimately, summary judgment is warranted only if a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the nonmovant. A......
  • Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Orland Fire Prot. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • July 7, 2016
    ...mere scintilla of evidence" and come forward with "specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial." Harris N.A. v. Hershey , 711 F.3d 794, 798 (7th Cir.2013). Ultimately, summary judgment is warranted only if a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the nonmovant. An......
  • Midwest Trading Grp., Inc. v. GlobalTranz Enters., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • July 23, 2014
    ...a “mere scintilla of evidence,” meaning “evidence on which [a] jury could reasonably find for the non-moving party.” Harris N.A. v. Hershey, 711 F.3d 794, 798 (7th Cir.2013) (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ). In ruling on the......
  • Chi. Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Van Der Laan (In re Van Der Laan)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • August 24, 2016
    ...is not sufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the non-moving party." Harris N.A. v. Hershey, 711 F.3d 794, 798 (7th Cir.2013)(citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. at 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505). UNCONTESTED FACTS Local Bankruptcy Rules 7056-1 and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT