Harris v. State
Decision Date | 13 December 1909 |
Docket Number | 13,892 |
Citation | 96 Miss. 379,50 So. 626 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | WILLIAM HARRIS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI |
FROM the circuit court of Pike county, HON. MOYSE H. WILKINSON Judge.
Harris appellant, a negro, was indicted in the circuit court of Amite county for an assault and battery with intent to kill and murder a white man; on his application the venue was changed to Pike county, where defendant was tried, convicted and appealed to the supreme court. The opinion of the court states the facts upon which the decision turned.
Reversed.
Clem V. Ratcliff, for appellant.
George Butler, assistant attorney-general, for appellee.
The appellant, a negro, was indicted for shooting with intent to kill and murder a white man. The evidence in the case for the state abounds in contradictions, as between different witnesses, and as to part of the testimony of one witness with other parts of the same witness' testimony. In short, the utmost confusion and uncertainty prevails throughout the testimony of the witnesses for the state, making the case an exceedingly close one on the facts--so close that any serious error must, of necessity, cause reversal.
This being the attitude of the case, the district attorney, in his closing argument for the state, as shown by five separate special bills of exception taken to his remarks in that closing argument, used the following language "Gentlemen, I am putting it up now to twelve white men as to whether or not you will convict a negro for shooting a white man, and the jury last week convicted a white man for killing a negro; and I hope you will have the same sort of nerve, and convict this negro for shooting the white man." "The time to turn a nigger loose for shooting a white man will never come in Amite county." ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Winchester v. State
...State, 158 Miss. 588, 130 So. 908; Harwell v. State, 129 Miss. 858, 93 So. 366; Gurley v. State, 101 Miss. 190, 57 So. 565; Harris v. State, 96 Miss. 379, 50 So. 626; Prince v. State, 93 Miss. 263, 46 So. 537; v. State, 92 Miss. 180, 45 So. 149; Smith v. State, 87 Miss. 627, 40 So. 229, 230......
-
Owen v. State
... ... State, ... 120 Miss. 744, 83 So. 83; Funches v. State, 125 ... Miss. 140, 87 So. 487; Story v. State, 133 Miss ... 476, 97 So. 806; Hughey v. State (Miss.), 106 So ... 361; Walton v. State, 147 Miss. 17, 112 So. 601; ... Sykes v. State, 89 Miss. 766, 42 So. 875; Harris ... v. State, 96 Miss. 379, 50 So. 626; Hardaway v ... State, 99 Miss. 223, 54 So. 833, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1166 ... On ... examination of two of the jurors it was shown that they were ... related to the two witnesses, Gates and Stephens, [177 Miss ... 505] who had gone to the ... ...
-
Livingston v. State, 57198
...So. 908 (1930); Harwell v. State, 129 Miss. 858, 93 So. 366 (1922); Gurley v. State, 101 Miss. 190, 57 So. 565 (1912); Harris v. State, 96 Miss. 379, 50 So. 626 (1909); Prince v. State, 93 Miss. 263, 46 So. 537 (1908); Smith v. State, 87 Miss. 627, 40 So. 229 (1906); Hoff v. State, 83 Miss.......
-
St. Louis & S.F.R. Co. v. Ault
...78 C. C. A. 62; Railway Co. v. Block, 86 Miss. 426; Railway Co. v. Guess, 74 Miss. 170; Railway Co. v. Thomas, 51 Miss. 637; Harris v. State, 50 So. 626; Hampton v. State, 88 Miss. 259; Sheenan Kearney, 82 Miss. 702; 3 Wigmore on Evidence, sec. 1958, p. 2603; 2 Wigmore on Evidence, sec. 980......