Harris v. State
Decision Date | 20 October 1995 |
Docket Number | CR-94-0999 |
Citation | 669 So.2d 1033 |
Parties | Mark Dewade HARRIS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
J. Stanton Glasscox, Oneonta, for Appellant.
Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Jean Therkelsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellee.
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant, Mark Dewade Harris, filed the petition to contest his extradition to the State of Georgia on a charge of burglary.
The appellant contends that "[t]he supporting papers, documents, and the like, submitted by the State of Georgia, and accompanying the rendition warrant [of the Governor of Alabama ordering the appellant's return to Georgia], are faulty and flawed." Appellant's brief at 4. The appellant specifically argues that an affidavit for the appellant's arrest on the burglary charge made before a Georgia superior court judge and attached to the extradition demand by the Governor of Georgia is insufficient because, he says, the affiant had no personal knowledge of the facts, failed to state the sources for and details of the information underlying the facts, and failed to set forth facts warranting a finding of probable cause that the appellant committed the crime charged.
Rayburn v. State, 366 So.2d 698, 702 (Ala.Cr.App.1978).
In arguing that the affidavit for arrest is insufficient, the appellant relies on certain language from Rayburn, where Judge Bowen, writing for the Court, stated:
" "
366 So.2d at 704 (quoting 31 Am.Jur.2d Extradition § 38).
Judge Bowen wrote further in Rayburn:
" 'Where the [extradition] proceeding is based on an affidavit, the affidavit must contain facts from which the governor of the asylum state may determine that there is probable cause to believe that the person demanded committed the crime with which he is charged; it should set forth the facts and circumstances relied on to prove the crime, or it must set out the alleged crime with sufficient explicitness to apprise the governor who receives it of the facts which constitute the offense, while an indictment is prima facie evidence of probable cause.' "
366 So.2d at 704-05 (quoting 35 C.J.S. Extradition § 14(7)).
In Rayburn, the governor of California sought the extradition of the defendant from this state based on an information and a supporting affidavit. However, even though we found the affidavit in question to be insufficient, this Court held that the information, standing alone, was sufficient for the issuance of a rendition warrant by the governor of this state, because California law required a finding of probable cause before an information could be issued. Rayburn, 366 So.2d at 707.
In Emmons v. State, 650 So.2d 612 (Ala.Cr.App.1994), we cited Rayburn in holding that while an affidavit supporting an amended information accompanying an extradition demand by Illinois's governor was insufficient, the amended information was sufficient to support extradition by this state:
Thus, any deficiencies in an affidavit forming the basis of an extradition proceeding may be overcome where it is apparent that there has been a judicial determination of probable cause in the demanding state. This rule applies whether the affidavit is in support of an information or is the basis of a warrant issued by a magistrate. In Michigan v. Doran, 439 U.S. 282, 99 S.Ct. 530, 58 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978), the United States Supreme Court stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Calhoun v. State
...300, 303 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), quoting Michigan v. Doran, 439 U.S. 282, 287, 99 S.Ct. 530, 534, 58 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978)." Harris v. State, 669 So.2d 1033, 1036 (Ala.Cr. App.1995). The trial court's denial of Calhoun's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was Based on the foregoing, the judgment ......