Harris v. State

Decision Date09 September 1987
Docket NumberNo. 44640,44640
CitationHarris v. State, 359 S.E.2d 675, 257 Ga. 385 (Ga. 1987)
PartiesHARRIS, Jr. v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Lennie W. Jones, Atlanta, for Robert Harris, Jr.

Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Atlanta, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SMITH, Justice.

The appellant, Robert Harris, Jr., went uninvited to the apartment of his estranged wife where he encountered the victim, Clarence Griggs. The appellant stabbed the unarmed victim six times causing his death. Three of the stab wounds were in the victim's back. The appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. We affirm. 1

1. The appellant asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on involuntary manslaughter.

The trial court was correct in refusing to charge the jury as requested. The evidence showed that the appellant stabbed the victim while they were in the apartment and then followed him outside where he was heard saying "I should have killed you, ..." before he stabbed him again. Although the appellant testified that he did not intend to kill the victim, the evidence showed that he repeatedly stabbed him. The unlawful use of the knife, a deadly weapon, while repeatedly stabbing the victim constituted the felony of aggravated assault; thus a charge on involuntary manslaughter would have been improper. See OCGA § 16-5-3.

2. The evidence produced at trial was sufficient to have authorized a rational trier of fact to conclude that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the murder of Clarence Griggs. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

1 The crime was committed on October 11, 1986. The Fulton County Jury returned its verdict of guilty on March 17, 1987. The notice of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • McIver v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 30, 2022
    ...manslaughter not required when appellant pointed gun directly at victim and shot victim multiple times); Harris v. State , 257 Ga. 385, 386 (1), 359 S.E.2d 675 (1987) (trial court properly refused to charge on unlawful act involuntary manslaughter when appellant repeatedly stabbed victim an......
  • Lolley v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1989
    ...constituted the felony of aggravated assault; thus a charge on involuntary manslaughter would have been improper. [Harris v. State, 257 Ga. 385, 386, 359 S.E.2d 675 (1987).] 5. Other alleged deficiencies at trial were corrected by the trial court and do not provide grounds for 6. A rational......
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 21, 1989
    ...L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); OCGA § 16-8-14(a); Walker v. State, 176 Ga.App. 783, 338 S.E.2d 36 (1985); OCGA § 16-5-21(a)(2); Harris v. State, 257 Ga. 385(1), 359 S.E.2d 675 (1987). 3. Appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error when it allowed an eleven-member jury to deliberate o......
  • Watkins v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1994
    ...manslaughter as the unlawful use of a deadly weapon to shoot the victim constituted the felony of aggravated assault. Harris v. State, 257 Ga. 385(2), 359 S.E.2d 675 (1987). Appellant was not entitled to a charge on aggravated assault as the evidence was uncontradicted that the victim died ......
  • Get Started for Free