Harris v. State, 45A03–1605–CR–1168.

Decision Date29 December 2016
Docket NumberNo. 45A03–1605–CR–1168.,45A03–1605–CR–1168.
Citation66 N.E.3d 628
Parties Reginald Seville HARRIS, Appellant–Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee–Plaintiff.
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Kristin A. Mulholland, Appellate Public Defender, Crown Point, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Katherine Modesitt Cooper, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

BROWN, Judge.

[1] Reginald Seville Harris appeals his conviction for battery against a public safety official as a level 5 felony. Harris raises one issue which we revise and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting testimony regarding a handgun. We affirm.

[2] The State charged Harris with battery against a public safety official as a level 5 felony and resisting law enforcement as a level 6 felony stemming from an altercation that he and his girlfriend, Summer Snow, had with a Gary police officer at Snow's house. Snow and Harris were represented by the same attorney and were tried together in a jury trial. At trial, the court admitted Gary Police Officer Terry Peck's testimony that Snow reported to him that Harris was in her vehicle and refused to leave and that, when he asked Snow if she had any weapons, she stated no. Officer Peck testified that he opened the door and told Harris that he needed to leave the car, that Harris refused, that he placed his hand on Harris's arm and urged him to exit the car, and that Harris grabbed his wrist, pulled him halfway into the car, and struck him in the face, the side of his body and head, and his arms. Officer Peck testified he eventually broke free from Harris, pulled him from the car, and placed him in handcuffs in his police vehicle. He testified that Snow continued to shout at him despite warnings to stop, that he eventually ordered her to place her hands on the car, and that she refused.

[3] The court also admitted Officer Peck's testimony that, when he tried to grab Snow's wrists, she pulled away from him and placed or tucked her hands underneath her sweatshirt or the light jacket she was wearing, that when he grabbed one of her arms and placed that arm into cuffs he felt an object hit his knee and the top of his boot, that he struggled a little longer to subdue Snow and place her in handcuffs, and that he and another law enforcement officer who arrived at the scene discovered that the object that had fallen to the ground was a handgun, which belonged to Snow. The jury found Harris guilty as charged. The trial court merged the count for resisting law enforcement with the count for battery against a public safety official, entered judgment for battery against a public safety official as a level 5 felony, and sentenced Harris to two and one-half years, all suspended to probation.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Harris v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • June 22, 2017
    ...challenging the gun's admission at trial. The Court of Appeals affirmed Harris's convictions in a split decision. Harris v. State , 66 N.E.3d 628, 629 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016). Harris petitioned for transfer, arguing that the Court of Appeals incorrectly applied the defunct res gestae standard.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT