Harris v. Texas
Decision Date | 22 June 1964 |
Docket Number | M,No. 963,963 |
Citation | 84 S.Ct. 1930,12 L.Ed.2d 1040,378 U.S. 572 |
Parties | Stafford James HARRIS v. TEXAS. isc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Marian S. Rosen, for petitioner.
Carl E. F. Dally, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
For opinion on remand see 384 S.W.2d 349.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Mayberry
-
U.S. v. Kilpatrick
... ... The computer indexing was done at Lowry Air Force Base in Colorado, in Ogden, Utah, and in Dallas, Texas. As to the latter two sites, there were no employees shown on the Rule 6(e) disclosure list. Assuming that this allegation finds support in the ... ...
-
State v. Bey
... ... Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968), to Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 100 S.Ct. 2521, 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980), and Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 105 S.Ct. 844, 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). Witherspoon held ... Harris, 36 Cal.3d 36, 201 Cal.Rptr. 782, 797-98, 679 P.2d 433, 448-49 (1984). Accordingly, several jurisdictions have held that it is improper to present ... ...
- Com. v. Gordon