Harrison v. City of Pontiac, Mich.

Decision Date18 January 1961
Docket NumberNo. 14146.,14146.
Citation285 F.2d 305
PartiesCecil J. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PONTIAC, MICH., Board of Trustees of Pontiac General Hospital, Medical Staff of Pontiac General Hospital, a voluntary unincorporated association, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Armand A. Palombo, Detroit, Mich., Hugh K. Davidson, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for appellant.

Harold B. Desenberg, Detroit, Mich., Moll, Desenberg, Purdy & Glover, Detroit, Mich., and William A. Ewart, Pontiac, Mich., on brief, for appellees.

Before SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order dismissing with prejudice an action brought by the plaintiff-appellant in the District Court with jurisdiction asserted because of diversity of citizenship. The plaintiff originally claimed damages against Dr. Neil Sullenberger, physician and surgeon, for surgical malpractice and from the defendants-appellees for negligent operation of Pontiac General Hospital. The case against Dr. Sullenberger having been settled and dismissed by stipulation and order, the appellant pursues his appeal against the remaining defendants below.

The complaint charges that Dr. Sullenberger was affiliated with Pontiac General Hospital and that the defendants, other than Dr. Sullenberger, operate the hospital in a proprietary capacity, deriving profit from its operation; that the defendant doctor, under the direction of the trustees and medical staff of the hospital undertook to diagnose, prescribe for and remedy the illness apparently suffered by the plaintiff and prescribed surgery therefor. This was performed on the plaintiff by Dr. Sullenberger as a consequence of which a sponge used in the course of the operation was left in the abdominal cavity of the patient and the incision having been sutured a second operation was needed to remove the sponge. Liability against the other defendants is apparently based on the theory of negligence, as owners and operators of the hospital. Subsequently, after two pre-trial sessions, a motion was jointly filed by the appellees asking dismissal of the action.

Both the original complaint and the motion to dismiss referred to the Pontiac City Ordinances and the purpose and manner of the operation of the hospital. There is permissive Michigan constitutional and legislative authority given to a municipality to own and operate hospitals. Pontiac General Hospital operates through a Board of Trustees, pursuant to such authority. Pontiac Ordinances provide for the Board's creation and specify its duties. The Board is directed to adopt such rules and regulations as may be necessary to control the collection and expenditure of funds. It is required to submit a budget every year to the City Commission for the operation of the hospital, including the sum appropriated and advanced, not to exceed $75,000.00 per year, from the general funds of the city. It is directed to adjust the schedule of charges made for hospital services so as to reflect all costs but is forbidden to reduce charges in effect for nonresidents. The hospital is run by a Hospital Director who is responsible to the trustees and neither the Board nor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Knight v. City of Tecumseh
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 12 Agosto 1975
    ...function' of a public hospital, the court has found that such hospital did, indeed, perform a governmental function. Harrison v. City of Pontiac, 285 F.2d 305 (C.A.6, 1961); Martinson v. City of Alpena, 328 Mich. 595, 44 N.W.2d 148 (1950); McCann v. State of Michigan, 47 Mich.App. 326, 209 ......
  • Herlihy Mid-Continent Company v. Bay City
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 25 Julio 1961
    ...N.W.2d 332; Royston v. City of Charlotte, supra; Richards v. Birmingham School District, 348 Mich. 490, 83 N.W.2d 643; Harrison v. City of Pontiac, 6 Cir., 285 F.2d 305. It is likewise true that when engaged in a proprietary function, a city has the same liability and may be sued in the sam......
  • Lykins v. Peoples Community Hospital, Civ. A. No. 38339.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • 7 Marzo 1973
    ...cite two cases for the proposition that the operation of a public hospital authority is a governmental function. Harrison v. City of Pontiac, 285 F.2d 305 (6th Cir. 1961); and Martinson v. City of Alpena, 328 Mich. 595, 44 N.W.2d 148 (1950). But these cases were decided while judicially est......
  • Snow v. Freeman
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 14 Agosto 1974
    ...222 N.W.2d 43 ... 55 Mich.App. 84 ... Rosemary SNOW, Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Gene ... (Michigan Const.1963, art. I, § 17). Grubaugh v. City of St. Johns, 384 Mich. 165, 180 N.W.2d 778 (1970). For a right to be ... Harrison v. City ... of Pontiac, 285 F.2d 305 (C.A. 6, 1961); Martinson v. City ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT