Harrison v. Harrison
| Docket Number | 66157 |
| Decision Date | 28 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Roe v. Roe
...Although some of its authority may be delegated "by appointing a third party to perform quasijudicial duties," Harrison v. Harrison , 132 Nev. 564, 572, 376 P.3d 173, 178 (2016), the "decision-making authority [to be delegated] must be limited to nonsubstantive issues ... and it cannot exte......
-
Roe v. Roe
... ... its authority "by appointing a third party to perform ... quasi-judicial duties," Harrison v ... Harrison, 132 Nev. 564, 572, 376 P.3d 173, 178 ... (2016), the "decision-making authority [that is ... delegated] must be ... ...
-
Mizrachi v. Mizrachi
...unless and until a party moves to modify those terms.7 Rivero, 125 Nev. at 429, 216 P.3d at 226 ; see also Harrison v. Harrison , 132 Nev. ––––, ––––, 376 P.3d 173, –––– (2016) (explaining that the appellate court will not rewrite a contract to include terms not agreed to by the parties).Wh......
-
Melinkoff v. Sanchez-Losada
...the father in Nevada and, whether we like it or not, its findings are entitled to significant deference. See Harrison v. Harrison, 132 Nev. ___, ___, 376 P.3d 173, 175 (2016) ("We also recognize broad discretionary powers for district courts when deciding child custody matters."). So, in a ......
Get Started for Free