Harrison v. Schaefer, No. 854
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; FORTAS |
Citation | 383 U.S. 269,86 S.Ct. 929,15 L.Ed.2d 750 |
Parties | William H. HARRISON v. Harry H. SCHAEFER et al. . Thomas O. Miller, for appellants. A. G. McClintock, for appellees |
Docket Number | No. 854 |
Decision Date | 28 February 1966 |
v.
Harry H. SCHAEFER et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming.
Thomas O. Miller, for appellants.
A. G. McClintock, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial42 practice notes
-
Johnson, In re, Cr. 13672
...decision in Forgett v. United States, Supra, 390 U.S. 203, 88 S.Ct. 898, vacating a prior denial of certiorari ((1966) 383 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 845) and remanding for further consideration in the light of Haynes. Since Forgett involved the statutory scheme condemned by Haynes ......
-
Jackman v. Bodine
...Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 84 S.Ct. 1459, 12 L.Ed.2d 632 (1964), and Harrison v. Schaefer, 383 U.S. 269, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 750 (1966). In Lucas, the Court had said that a house was 'arguably' apportioned on a population basis where the ratio was......
-
Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America, No. 72-1709.
...Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(a) (1966 amend.); Lord v. Helmandollar, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 170, 348 F.2d 780, 782 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 928, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 847 28 We note at this point that the District Court was powerless to grant that sort of relief. A motion under Rule 60(b) does n......
-
Gomez v. Wilson, No. 71-1484.
...1, 5, 419 F.2d 303, 307 (1969); Lord v. Helmandollar, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 170, 348 F.2d 780, 782 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 928, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 847 (1966). Consequently, we have no occasion to probe the validity of the District Court's decision on those aspects of the litiga......
Request a trial to view additional results
42 cases
-
Gomez v. Wilson, No. 71-1484.
...1, 5, 419 F.2d 303, 307 (1969); Lord v. Helmandollar, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 170, 348 F.2d 780, 782 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 928, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 847 (1966). Consequently, we have no occasion to probe the validity of the District Court's decision on those aspects of the litiga......
-
Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America, No. 72-1709.
...Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(a) (1966 amend.); Lord v. Helmandollar, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 170, 348 F.2d 780, 782 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 928, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 847 28 We note at this point that the District Court was powerless to grant that sort of relief. A motion under Rule 60(b) does n......
-
Johnson, In re, Cr. 13672
...decision in Forgett v. United States, Supra, 390 U.S. 203, 88 S.Ct. 898, vacating a prior denial of certiorari ((1966) 383 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 845) and remanding for further consideration in the light of Haynes. Since Forgett involved the statutory scheme condemned by Haynes ......
-
Whitcomb v. Chavis, No. 92
...87 S.Ct. 820, 17 L.Ed.2d 771 (1967). See also Burnette v. Davis, 382 U.S. 42, 86 S.Ct. 181, 15 L.Ed.2d 35 (1965); Harrison v. Schaefer, 383 U.S. 269, 86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 750 (1966).22 That voters in multi-member Page 143 districts vote for and are represented by more legislators than v......
Request a trial to view additional results