Harrison v. State

Decision Date13 January 1955
Docket Number7 Div. 269
Citation262 Ala. 701,77 So.2d 387
PartiesGeorge Thomas HARRISON v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Max J. Howard and Leonard Crawford, Fort Payne, for petitioner.

Bernard F. Sykes and Arthur Joe Grant, Asst. Attys. Gen., opposed.

MERRILL, Justice.

Petition of George Thomas Harrison for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Harrison v. State, 77 So.2d 384.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Rayburn v. State, 3 Div. 894
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 3 Octubre 1978
    ...the governor acted properly in issuing the rendition warrant. Harrison v. State, 38 Ala.App. 60, 77 So.2d 384, cert. denied, 262 Ala. 701, 77 So.2d 387 (1954); Denson v. State, 36 Ala.App. 216, 57 So.2d 830, cert. denied, 257 Ala. 184, 57 So.2d 832 (1951). When the rendition warrant recites......
  • Emmons v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 19 Agosto 1994
    ...the governor acted properly in issuing the rendition warrant. Harrison v. State, 38 Ala.App. 60, 77 So.2d 384, cert. denied, 262 Ala. 701, 77 So.2d 387 (1954); Denson v. State, 36 Ala.App. 216, 57 So.2d 830, cert. denied, 257 Ala. 184, 57 So.2d 832 (1951). "When the rendition warrant recite......
  • State ex rel. Anderson v. Weinstein
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 6 Agosto 1962
    ...250. State of Florida et al. v. Bennett, Fla., 90 So.2d 43; Harrison v. State, Ala.App., 38 Ala.App. 60, 77 So.2d 384, cert. den., 262 Ala. 701, 77 So.2d 387; Ex parte Coleman, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 245 S.W.2d In his petition for the writ of habeas corpus petitioner did not claim that the foreg......
  • State v. Bennett
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 21 Septiembre 1956
    ...have had occasion to consider this section of the Uniform Act. See Harrison v. State, Ala.App., 77 So.2d 384, certiorari denied 262 Ala. 701, 77 So.2d 387, and Ex parte Coleman, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 245 S.W.2d Finally, we consider the contention of appellee that the crime here involved is not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT