Harrison v. Weatherly
Decision Date | 17 June 1899 |
Citation | 54 N.E. 237,180 Ill. 418 |
Parties | HARRISON et al. v. WEATHERLY et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from circuit court, Adams county; John C. Broady, Judge.
Bill by Edwin M. Harrison and another against Thomas Weatherly and others for partition of certain real estate. From a judgment dismissing their complaint on demurrer, complainants appeal. Affirmed.G. Edmunds, J. H. Williams, and Arnold & Gale, for appellants.
Neece & Son, Wyand & Brown, Sharp & Berry Bros., Scofield, O'Harra & Scofield, N. F. Anderson, B. F. Thompson, A. P. Miller, Charles K. Ladd, Stevens, Horton & Abbott, Jack & Tichenor, C. C. Craig, Grier & Stewart, and Thompson & Donahue, for appellees.
A copy of the will, and of the certificates appended thereto, which is referred to in the opinion in this case, is as follows:
MAGRUDER, J. (after stating the facts).
This case comes up from an order of the court below sustaining a demurrer to the bill, and dismissing it, for want of equity. Therefore, as to the facts, we are confined to the allegations of the bill. Both appellants, who were complainants below, and appellees, who were defendants below, claim title under one Richard Smith, who in his lifetime was a resident of Wake county, in the state of North Carolina, and died testate in that state in the year 1852. A copy of his will, dated October 10, 1851, is attached to the bill, and referred to therein as an exhibit. Richard Smith left surviving him a widow, named Penelope Smith, and one child only, a daughter, named Mary A. Smith, his only heir at law. The widow is dead, and the daughter, who married one Morehead after the execution of the deed hereinafter mentioned, died on January 4, 1891, leaving no issue, and without having had any child or children. Morehead is also dead. At the time of his death, Richard Smith owned in fee 35 quarter sections of land situated in Adams, Pike, Calhoun, McDonough, Schuyler, Fulton, Peoria, Stark, Knox, Warren, Henderson, Mercer, and Henry counties, in Illinois. On February 20, 1856, Penelope Smith and Mary A. Smith executed a warranty deed to one Silas T. Green, of Richmond, Ky., conveying to him all the lands in Illinois which Richard Smith owned at his death, describingthem as ‘all those certain tracts of land situated in the military bounty land district in the state of Illinois.’ The grantors in the deed are described as ‘Penelope Smith, widow, and Mary A. Smith, only child, together sole heirs of Richard Smith, deceased, late of Raleigh, North Carolina.’ A copy of the deed is referred to in the bill, and attached thereto as an exhibit. The deed contains no reference whatever to any will of Richard Smith, and no intimation that the grantors held as devisees, or otherwise than as heirs of a deceased intestate. The deed to Green was recorded in many of the counties where the lands are situated. After...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graves v. Graves
...381 Ill. 587; 14 Cyc. 33; 18 C.J., pp. 821, 822, and notes; Collins v. Whitman, 22 S.W. 840; Peugnet v. Berthold, 183 Mo. 64; Harrison v. Weatherly, 180 Ill. 418; In re Kenyon, 17 R.I. 149 Stokes v. Van Wzak, 83 Va. 725; Gilman v. Stone, 123 Ky. 137; Begley v. Watson, 98 Tenn. 353; Loring v......
-
Graves v. Graves
... ... Ill. 587; 14 Cyc. 33; 18 C. J., pp. 821, 822, and notes; ... Collins v. Whitman, 22 S.W. 840; Peugnet v ... Berthold, 183 Mo. 64; Harrison v. Weatherly, ... 180 Ill. 418; In re Kenyon, 17 R. I. 149 Stokes ... v. Van Wzak, 83 Va. 725; Gilman v. Stone, 123 ... Ky. 137; Begley v. Watson, ... ...
-
Collins v. Whitman
... ... reversion vests in such only child and heir, even though he ... is the life tenant under the will. Peugnet v ... Berthold, 183 Mo. 64; Harrison v. Weatherly, ... 180 Ill. 418; In re Kenyon, 17 R. I. 149; Stokes ... v. Van Wyck, 83 Va. 724; Gilman v. Stone, 123 ... Ky. 137; Bigley v ... ...
-
Sternberg v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...v. Winter, 247 Ill. 243, 93 N.E. 145;Peet v. Peet, 229 Ill. 341, 82 N.E. 376, 13 L.R.A.,N.S., 780, 11 Ann.Cas. 492;Harrison v. Weatherby, 180 Ill. 418, 54 N.E. 237, and in many other decisions of this court. The rule was well stated by the Supreme Court of Missouri in Dobschutz v. Dobschutz......