Hart v. Kennedy, 69-238 Civ.
| Decision Date | 16 October 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 69-238 Civ.,69-238 Civ. |
| Citation | 314 F. Supp. 823 |
| Parties | M. L. HART, Plaintiff, v. David M. KENNEDY, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, and Dorothy A. Elston, Treasurer of the United States, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Oklahoma |
L. W. Setz, Ozark, Ark., for plaintiff.
William R. Burkett, U. S. Atty., and Givens L. Adams, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.
Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal filed herein, the Court finds the same to be without merit and should be denied.
The District Judge with whom a case is filed has the responsibility to determine whether jurisdiction exists. Lion Mfg. Corporation v. Kennedy, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 330 F.2d 833 (1964). Jurisdiction is lacking if a plaintiff has no standing to sue. American Commuters Assn. v. Levitt, 279 F.Supp. 40 (S.D.N.Y.1967). The provision requiring the presence of a court of three judges necessarily assumes that the District Court has jurisdiction. Ex parte Poresky, 290 U.S. 30, 54 S.Ct. 3, 78 L.Ed. 152 (1933).
Said District Judge also has the responsibility to refuse a request to convene a statutory three-judge court when there is no jurisdiction for lack of standing to sue or the claim is insubstantial for lack of a judicial controversy. Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. Rogers, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 265 F.2d 593 at p. 396 (1959), mandamus denied, 361 U.S. 805, 80 S.Ct. 93, 4 L.Ed.2d 56 (1959); Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vincent, 375 F.2d 129 (Second Cir. 1967); Miller v. Smith, 236 F.Supp. 927 (E.D.Pa.1965); Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512 (1962). A three-judge court does not exist until it has been created by the Chief Judge of the Circuit. Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. Rogers, supra. A three-judge court was not created herein.
Dismissal is proper in either event. Rule 12(b), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A.; Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Vincent, supra; Lion Mfg. Corporation v. Kennedy, supra; Board of Ed. of Ind. Sch. Dist. 20, Muskogee v. State of Okl., 409 F.2d 665 (Tenth Cir. 1969).
Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
42 249 Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit Union 8212 858
...6 Cir., 446 F.2d 833, 837; American Commuters Assn. v. Levitt, D.C., 279 F.Supp. 40, aff'd, 2 Cir., 405 F.2d 1148; Hart v. Kennedy, 10 Cir., 314 F.Supp. 823, 824. 19 Where a single judge refuses to request the convention of a three-judge court, but retains jurisdiction, review of his refusa......
-
Shapiro v. State of Maryland
...for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of Md., supra, 429 F.2d at 611 and cases therein cited; see also Hart v. Kennedy, 314 F.Supp. 823 (D. Okla. 1969); Cornwell v. State Board of Education, 314 F.Supp. 340 (D.Md. 1969), aff'd, 428 F.2d 471, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 942, 91 S.Ct. ......
-
Sharrow v. Peyser
...and whether a plaintiff has standing. Lion Mfg. Corp. v. Kennedy, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 330 F.2d 833 (1964); Hart v. Kennedy, 314 F.Supp. 823, 824 (W.D.Okl.1969); American Commuters Assn. v. Levitt, 279 F.Supp. 40, 46 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff'd, 405 F.2d 1148 (2d Cir. Neither the proposed amendm......
-
Pettit v. New Mexico
...that the District Court has jurisdiction."), mandamus denied, 376 U.S. 948, 84 S.Ct. 976, 11 L.Ed.2d 977 (1963); Hart v. Kennedy, 314 F.Supp. 823, 824 (W.D.Okla.1969). ANALYSIS Neither Pettit's Complaint nor his Verified Request for Three-Judge Panel offers any legal or statutory authority ......