Hart v. Sealtest Inc., 95.

• Citation: 46 A.2d 293
• Decision Date: 15 March 1946
• Docket Number: No. 95.,95.
• Parties: HART v. SEALTEST, Inc.
• Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland

46 A.2d 293

HART
v.
SEALTEST, Inc.

No. 95.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 15, 1946.

Appeal from Baltimore City Court; W. Conwell Smith, Chief Judge.

Action by Grace L. Hart against Sealtest, Inc., to recover damages for toxic poisoning. Judgment for defendant, notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

46 A.2d 294

Maurice J. Pressman, of Baltimore (Louis M. Silberstein and William Saxon, both on the brief), of Baltimore, for appellant.

Jesse Slingluff, Jr., of Baltimore, for appellee.

Before MARBURY, C. J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, GRASON, HENDERSON and MARKELL, JJ.

MARBURY, Chief Judge.

The appellant was employed in August 1937 as a research librarian for the appellee at the latter's research laboratory at 1403 Eutaw Place, at the corner of Lafayette Avenue in the City of Baltimore. This laboratory was maintained for the purpose of dairy research, improvement of milk products, and for the development of by-products of milk. Appellant, who is 33 years old and who is a college graduate, was paid $1,500 a year (later increased to $2,300) to take charge of the library on the first floor. The building, which was a converted residence, consisted of a basement and two floors. In the basement was the furnace room and the dairy technological laboratory. On the first floor, in addition to the library, were the main office in the front room and a small office next to it. All of the rooms on the first floor opened into a hall with a stairway leading to the second floor. On the second floor was located the analytical chemical laboratory in the front room; the by-products laboratory in the middle room and the cereal or bakery laboratory in the rear. The room in which appellant was employed was 15' x 22 1/2', with a high ceiling, about 12'-14', with five windows, two on Lafayette Avenue and three in the rear. Appellant stated that her duties in general were to ‘try to throw together a library and at the same time, to try to hunt up the literature on various projects.’ She prepared bibliographies, tried to find out everything on a particular subject from publications, tried to pick up cross-references, and sometimes obtained books from other libraries for the men in the various laboratories, which occasionally she took to the laboratories. The whole building was an experimental laboratory of the appellee and included chemical, bacteriological and dairy technological divisions. Odors and smells from the various chemical experiments permeated it all the time.

In the fall of 1942, experiments were begun in the by-products laboratory with a chemical known as methyl-acrylate, made out of milk and sugar. This chemical is a solvent type-that is, it is an organic liquid that has a solvent property for other materials. The object of the experiments with it was to combine it with other chemicals to see if synthetic rubber could not be made out of it. This chemical had a very bad odor and as soon as it began to be used, this odor went all over the building, even down to the basement. The fumes were heavy, pungent, acrid and appellant said they were nauseating. They were heavier than air, and very slow to disburse, and appellant said they centered around her desk in the library.

There were six or seven people working on this particular experiment. The fumes affected the appellant, first by giving her a skin rash on her face and ears, which she said would calm down on week ends when she was away from the library, and then would start again when she returned. She complained about it and apparently the other people in the building were complaining too, although none of them was affected as she was. Upstairs, the other laboratories were boarded off and the doors were ordered closed. The chemists employed in the by-products laboratory used hoods and

46 A.2d 295

some of them occasionally had to go out and walk in the fresh air to get rid of the effects of the fumes. Appellant began to feel ill in December 1942 or January 1943. Her eyes became irritated, she had sinus trouble and developed some sort of spells of coma which occurred at more and more frequent intervals. She lost control of her extremities, had a tired feeling...