Hart v. State, 5 Div. 301.
| Decision Date | 22 June 1939 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 301. |
| Citation | Hart v. State, 190 So. 98, 238 Ala. 188 (Ala. 1939) |
| Parties | JOE HART v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Edwina Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Robert S. Milner and Paul M. Page, both of Dadeville, opposed.
This cause is before this Court on petition of the State of Alabama, on relation of the Attorney General, for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, to review and revise the opinion and judgment of said court in the case of Joe Hart v. State of Alabama,190 So. 95.
Writ denied.
All the Justices concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Daniels v. State
...559 (1972); Walters v. State, 30 Ala.App. 547, 9 So.2d 32 (1942); Hart v. State, 28 Ala.App. 545, 190 So. 95, cert. denied, 238 Ala. 188, 190 So. 98 (1939). See also White v. State, 33 Ala.App. 92, 30 So.2d 466, cert. denied, 249 Ala. 158, 30 So.2d 468; Summers v. State, 19 Ala.App. 556, 99......
-
Brown v. State
...401 So.2d 213 ... David Lewis BROWN ... 3 Div. 336 ... Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama ... April 21, 1981 ... Hart v. State, 28 Ala.App. 545, 190 So. 95, cert. denied, 238 Ala. 199, 190 So ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 13. We disagree. The trial judge properly refused to give ... ...
-
James v. State
...that such statements were made. There is no error in this regard. Hart v. State, 28 Ala.App. 545, 190 So. 95, certiorari denied, 238 Ala. 188, 190 So. 98; Puckett v. State, Ala.App. 493, 127 So. 678, certiorari denied, 221 Ala. 698, 128 So. 910; Naugher v. State, 241 Ala. 91, 1 So.2d 294. (......
-
Ex parte DCH Regional Medical Center
... ... The employer relies on § 25-5-81, Code 1975, which provides: "The decision of the judge ... ...