Hart v. State
| Decision Date | 01 January 1873 |
| Citation | Hart v. State, 38 Tex. 382 (Tex. 1873) |
| Parties | LEWIS HART v. THE STATE OF TEXAS. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
1. Defendant was indicted for an assault upon one Persons; held, the omission to add the final letter to the name of Persons not such a change in the name as would vitiate the indictment.
2. A verdict of guilty of assault with “attempt to murder,” on an indictment for assault with intent to murder, is sufficiently definite to render judgment upon.
APPEAL from Caldwell. Tried below before the Hon. Henry Maney.
The facts appear in the opinion.
Nix & Story, and James H. Burts, for appellant.
Attorney General, for the state.
The appellant in this case was indicted for an assault upon one Rolan Persons, with “intent to kill and murder the said Rolan Person.” We think the omission to add the final letter to the name of Persons in the closing part of the indictment not such a change in the name as would vitiate the indictment; particularly as the name was frequently used and correctly spelled in the former part of the indictment, and then, finally, the party assaulted was referred to as “the said Rolan Person.” There can be no doubt, from the language of the indictment, that the person charged to have been assaulted is identical with the one the defendant is accused of intending to murder, and the clerical omission of the final letter in this case in nowise decreases the certainty of the indictment.
Neither is the objection to the verdict of the jury well taken. It can hardly be expected that the verdict of juries will always be in precise conformity with the letter of the law, nor in the technical language of the books; and therefore, if the verdict of a jury is entirely responsive to the charge in the indictment and the law, and is clear and intelligible, it is sufficient, though a different word may have been substituted in the verdict for one in the charge or the law, provided that substituted...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Robinson v. State
...have been dealt with by our courts in discussing predecessor statutes dealing with homicide. 16 In 1873, our Supreme Court in Hart v. State, 38 Tex. 382, held that there was no such offense as assault with intent to commit manslaughter. Earlier, the same court in White v. State, 22 Tex. 608......
-
Egery v. Power
... ... Hart v. Mills, 31 Tex. 313;Harris v. Hopson, 5 Tex. 529;Martel v. Hernshieme, 9 Tex. 294;Dial v. Rector, 12 Tex. 99;Chambers v. Hodges, 23 Tex, 110;Burr ... 375] “The jurisdiction of the court is the power given it by law to take cognizance of and try the case before it.” The State of Rhode Island v. The State of Massachusetts, 12 Pet. 717;United States v. Aredondo, 6 Pet. 709; Russell v. Mitchell, 25 Tex. 136; Comstock v ... ...
-
Scott v. People
...effort to carry that purpose into execution.’ Prince v. State, 35 Ala. 367; Lewis v. State, Id. 380; Gray v. State, 63 Ala. 73;Hart v. State, 38 Tex. 382;Johnson v. State, 14 Ga. 55. Counsel for plaintiff in error refer to several cases where the indictments were framed under statutes which......
-
Berry v. St. Louis Transit Co.
... ... that with an intention to become a passenger he was actually ... attempting to place a heavy letter-press upon the platform ... Price v. State, 35 Ala. 367; Hart v. State, ... 38 Tex. 382. It may be true that appellant, after he had ... gotten the letter-press upon the platform of the car, ... ...