Hart v. State

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtLUKE
CitationHart v. State, 26 Ga.App. 64, 105 S.E. 383 (Ga. App. 1920)
Decision Date16 December 1920
Docket Number(No. 11730.)
PartiesHART. v. STATE.

(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)

Error from City Court of Macon; Du Pont Guerry, Judge.

Obie Hart was convicted of operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors, and he brings error. Affirmed.

H. F. Rawls and Walter J. Grace, both of Macon, for plaintiff in error.

Will Gunn, Sol., Roy W. Moore, Sol., and Harry S. Strozier, all of Macon, for the State.

LUKE, J. [1] 1. The act of 1915 making it a misdemeanor to operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquors (Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1915, p. 115) may be violated by one who partakes of such liquors, as well as by one who partakes of them until a state of drunkenness is reached. The court did not err in instructing the jury as complained of.

(a) In the trial of such a case, evidence tending to show that the operator of the vehicle had whisky about his person, or in the vehicle with him, is relevant, being a circumstance for consideration by the jury upon the issue as to the operator's use of intoxicating liquors.

2. There was evidence tending to show that, while operating an automobile at considerable speed, the accused attempted in a reckless manner to pass another car going in the same direction; that in so doing he lost control of his own machine to such an...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Thompson v. State
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1929
    ... ... O. Wilson, Attorney General, ... and Richard J. Jackson, Assistant Attorney General, and oral ... argument by Mr. Jackson ... A ... careful review of the evidence submitted in this case will ... show that it is sufficient to prove defendant's ... intoxication; Hart v. State, 26 Ga.App. 64, 105 S.E ... 383; Com. v. Lyseth, 250 Mass. 555, 146 N.E. 18; ... State v. Hayden, 126 Kan. 799, 271 P. 291; ... Daniels v. State, 155 Tenn. 549, 296 S.W. 20; ... Lockhart v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. 597, 1 S.W. (2nd) ... 894; People v. Kelly, 70 Cal. A. 519, 234 ... ...
  • Shadden v. State
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 25, 1970
    ...or certain drugs. In Daniels v. State, 155 Tenn. 549, 558, 296 S.W. 20, the Supreme Court of this State said this: 'And in Hart v. State, 26 Ga.App. 64, 105 S.E. 383, it was held that it was not necessary for a driver to partake of intoxicating liquors until a state of drunkenness is reache......
  • Daniels v. State
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1927
    ...under a statute prohibiting the operation of motor vehicles "while under the influence of intoxicating liquor." And in Hart v. State, 26 Ga.App. 64, 105 S.E. 383, it held that it was not necessary for a driver to partake of intoxicating liquors until a state of drunkenness is reached, in or......
  • Sims v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 8, 1955
    ...'The foregoing cases are directly contradicted by and cannot be reconciled with the citations given in the cases which are Hart v. State, 26 Ga.App. 64 [105 S.E. 383], which lays down the distinctly different rule that 'In contemplation of law, an operator of a motor vehicle on the public h......
  • Get Started for Free