Hartmann, et al v. California Dept. of Corrections, et al

Docket Number11-16008
Decision Date19 February 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1645 cases
  • Koch v. Ahlin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 19 Diciembre 2019
    ...personal involvement in the acts or omissions constituting the alleged constitutional violation." Hartmann v. California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1127 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Hafer, 502 U.S. at 25, 112 S.Ct. 358). "Rather, a plaintiff need only identify the law or policy chal......
  • Alarcon v. Davey
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 9 Mayo 2017
    ...situated be treated alike. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439(1985); Hartmann v. California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1123 (9th Cir. 2013); Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1030 (9th Cir. 2013); Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878, 891 (9th Cir.......
  • Jones v. Speidell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 15 Mayo 2017
    ...situated be treated alike. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439(1985); Hartmann v. California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1123 (9th Cir. 2013); Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1030 (9th Cir. 2013); Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878, 891 (9th Cir.......
  • Williams v. Deleon
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 18 Diciembre 2017
    ...Clause," Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 221, 125 S.Ct. 2384 (2005), or the Equal Protection Clause, Hartmann v. California Dep't of Corrs. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1123 (9Cir. 2013); Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 686-87 (9th Cir. 2001). The deficiencies in this claim are not......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Prisoners' Rights
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-Annual Review, August 2022
    • 1 Agosto 2022
    ...to complete substance abuse program with religious content to be eligible for early parole); Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. and Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2013) (Establishment Clause claim because alleged that prison did not apply neutral criteria to determine chaplain hiring......
  • An Enduring American Heritage: A Substantive Due Process Right to Public Wild Lands
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 51-1, January 2021
    • 1 Enero 2021
    ...489 U.S. 189 (1989). 136. Gary B. v. Whitmer, 957 F.3d 616, 656 (6th Cir. 2020). 137. Hartmann v. California Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1126 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Johnson-Bey v. Lane, 863 F.2d 1308, 1312 (7th Cir. 1988)). 138. See Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 702 (2015......
  • B. Your Right to Practice Your Religion
    • United States
    • The Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook (CCR) Chapter Three
    • Invalid date
    ...chaplains for religions with more followers and not for other, less popular religions. Hartmann v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. and Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2013). 4. Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) In addition to the ......
  • Recent Legal Developments
    • United States
    • Sage Criminal Justice Review No. 39-2, June 2014
    • 1 Junio 2014
    ...liability under 42 U.S.C Section 1983.Prison Journal,82, 459–477.Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 707 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2013).Harvard Law Review Association (1994). The Supreme Court, 1993 term: Leading cases. Harvard Law Review,108, 231–240.Hope v. Pel......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT