Hartsfield v. Georgia
| Docket Number | S13A1608 |
| Decision Date | 17 March 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Woodard v. State
...State, 296 Ga. 636, 638–640, 769 S.E.2d 43 (2015) ; Dyer v. State, 295 Ga. 173, 177–179, 758 S.E.2d 301 (2014) ; Hartsfield v. State, 294 Ga. 883, 886–887, 757 S.E.2d 90 (2014). We conclude that the trial court did not commit reversible error in charging the jury using the language of OCGA ......
-
State v. Walker
...Dority v. State , 335 Ga.App. 83, 96 (4), 780 S.E.2d 129 (2015) (citation and punctuation omitted). See also Hartsfield v. State , 294 Ga. 883, 888 (3) (b), 757 S.E.2d 90 (2014) ("The proper assessment is an inquiry into the objective reasonableness of counsel’s performance, not counsel’s s......
-
Propst v. State
...of OCGA § 16–3–21 (b) (2). See, e.g. Jones v. State , 292 Ga. 593, 600–601 (7) (d), 740 S.E.2d 147 (2013) ; Hartsfield v. State , 294 Ga. 883, 888 (3) (b), 757 S.E.2d 90 (2014) (“[t]he proper assessment is ‘an inquiry into the objective reasonableness of counsel's performance, not counsel's......
-
Brown v. State
...tactical decision was "so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have followed such a course." Hartsfield v. State, 294 Ga. 883, 887, 757 S.E.2d 90 (2014). Accordingly, Appellant has not shown that his trial counsel was professionally deficient in this respect either. 3. App......
Request a trial to view additional results