Hartwein v. Hartwein

• Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM.
• Citation: Hartwein v. Hartwein, 362 S.W.3d 484 (Mo. App. 2012)
• Decision Date: 20 March 2012
• Docket Number: No. ED 96543.,ED 96543.
• Parties: Ogerta H. HARTWEIN, Appellant, v. Kirk M. HARTWEIN, Respondent.

362 S.W.3d 484

Ogerta H. HARTWEIN, Appellant,

v.Kirk M. HARTWEIN, Respondent.

No. ED 96543.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 20, 2012.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, 0911–FC00896, Jon Cunningham, Judge.Jane Ellen Tomich, St. Charles, MO, for appellant.

Michael R. Hanson, O'Fallon, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ogerta H. Hartwein (Mother) appeals from the trial court's dissolution judgment granting Kirk M. Hartwein (Father) sole legal and physical custody of the minor child, placing restrictions on the parties' ability to travel outside the country with the minor child, and ordering Mother to pay $18,000 of Father's attorney's fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court's decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Andrews v. Andrews, 344 S.W.3d 749, 749 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use...