Hartzell v. Hartzell
| Citation | 623 So.2d 323 |
| Parties | Scott HARTZELL v. Donda Lewis HARTZELL. 2910418-X. |
| Decision Date | 02 April 1993 |
| Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
J.R. Herring, Dothan, for appellant.
John Emory Waddell and Ron Storey, Dothan, for appellee.
Following ore tenus proceedings, the trial court entered an order on March 3, 1992, divorcing the parties upon a finding of incompatibility and dividing the marital assets. The husband appeals, and the wife cross-appeals. We affirm.
The record reflects that the parties were married in June 1989 and that they separated in September 1991. There were no children born of the marriage.
The wife was awarded the following assets: A checking account with a balance of $200, two certificates of deposit with First Alabama Bank totalling $37,887.72, a BMW automobile, the marital home and lot, and all household furnishings. The trial court awarded the following assets to the husband: two business accounts totalling $35,367.17, a 1988 Dodge truck, a 1967 GMC truck, two mobile homes, a satellite dish, a ski boat, Geneva County land with an egg business, a Mr. Transmission franchise and stock, and a savings account in the amount of $23,997.65.
At the time of the divorce, the wife was employed by the South Central Alabama Mental Health Center as a mental health counselor with a salary of $19,100 per year. The husband was a self-employed businessman.
The husband contends that the division of the marital estate was so inequitable as to amount to an abuse of discretion of the trial court. The wife contends on cross-appeal that the trial court erred in awarding substantial assets to the husband without awarding her equitable compensation.
The facts in this case show that in May 1988, prior to the marriage, the husband acquired a Mr. Transmission franchise, which was sold in September 1989 for $160,000. The purchaser paid $50,000 in cash, and the remainder was financed by the husband for five years at 12% interest. The franchise was reacquired by the husband in his name only in April 1991. At the time of the divorce the stock in this corporation was worth approximately $225,000.
Also prior to the marriage, the husband was involved in an automobile accident and was awarded approximately $27,900 for personal injuries. According to the husband, these proceeds were placed into certificates of deposit with First Alabama Bank. After the parties were married, the wife's name was placed on the certificates of deposit, and they were held jointly by the parties throughout the marriage.
During the marriage, the parties jointly acquired a BMW automobile which was used primarily by the wife. The parties also jointly acquired from the wife's father a house and lot located in Dothan for a purchase price of $50,000.
Additionally, the husband acquired land in Geneva County in his name only after the sale of the Mr. Transmission franchise in September 1989. A portion of the money from the sale of the franchise was used to make payments on the land and to build chicken houses for an egg business that produced approximately $25,000 in income per year. The parties financed the remainder of the purchase price of the land and the cost of building the chicken houses. All income from the egg business was used to maintain the business, and a mobile home and 1967 GMC truck were both used in the business.
The husband operated both the egg and the transmission business. The wife's involvement appears to be minimal; however, testimony revealed that she supported her husband's efforts and occasionally helped out. The husband also maintained separate accounts for business purposes. The account for the egg business had a balance of $15,200.33, and the transmission business account had a balance of $20,166.84.
After the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morgan v. Morgan
...this rule, the trial court's judgment will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly and palpably wrong. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So. 2d 323 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). Matters of property division rest soundly within the trial court's discretion and its determination regarding those matt......
-
Cheshire v. Cheshire
...findings will be presumed correct and will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly and palpably wrong. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So. 2d 323 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). Matters of alimony and property division are interrelated, and the entire judgment must be considered in determining whe......
-
Fields v. Fields
...will be presumed to be correct and will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly and palpably wrong. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So. 2d 323 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993). This presumption of correctness is based on the trial court's unique position to observe the witnesses and to assess their ......
-
House v. House, 2130660.
...findings will be presumed to be correct and will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly and palpably wrong. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So.2d 323 (Ala.Civ.App.1993). This presumption of correctness is based on the trial court's unique position to observe the witnesses and to assess t......
-
§ 11.01 Transmutation by Title
...46 Va. App. 652, 621 S.E.2d 147 (2005); Utsch v. Utsch, 28 Va. App. 450, 565 S.E.2d 345 (2002).[13] See: Alabama: Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So.2d 323 (Ala. App. 1993); Farmer v. Farmer, 398 So.2d 723 (Ala. App. 1981). Alaska: Chotiner v. Chotiner, 829 P.2d 829 (Alaska 1992); Lewis v. Lewis,......
-
Distributing Personal Injury Settlements and Workers� Compensation Awards in Divorce
...WL 905509 (Del.Fam.Ct. 1997); Taylor v. Taylor, WL 878418 (Del.Fam.Ct. 1997). [80] A representative list includes: Hartzell v. Hartzell, 623 So.2d 323 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993) (commingled premarital PI settlement became marital property); Davis v. Davis, 534 P.2d 809 (Colo.App. 1975) (PI award c......