Harvey v. Rush County Com'rs
Decision Date | 13 June 1884 |
Citation | 32 Kan. 159,4 P. 153 |
Parties | ALEXANDER HARVEY, as Treasurer of Rush County, et al., v. HE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF RUSH COUNTY |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Error from Rush District Court.
ACTION by Alexander Harvey, treasurer of Rush county, Allen McCann county clerk of said county, and F. C. Brooks, superintendent of public instruction of said county, against The Board of Commissioners of that county, upon the following agreed statement of facts:
Trial had at the September Term of the court for 1883, a jury being waived. The court, after examining the agreed statement of facts and hearing the argument of counsel thereon, and being fully advised in the premises, rendered judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendant for all costs. To the rendition of the judgment the plaintiffs excepted 3, and bring the case here.
Judgment affirmed.
S. I Hale, for plaintiffs in error.
G. P Cline, county...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Smith v. Brown
...decisions support that case: Beach v. Leahy, 11 Kan. 23; Commissioners of Norton County v. Shoemaker, 27 Kan. 77; Harvey v. Commissioners of Rush County, 32 Kan. 159, 4 P. 153; Weyand v. Stover, 35 Kan. 545, 11 P. 355; City of Wichita v. Burleigh, 36 Kan. 34, 12 P. 332; State v. Sanders, 42......
-
State v. Brown
... ... certain cause pending in the district court of Beckham ... county, state of Oklahoma, entitled State of Oklahoma ex rel ... Fred S ... Commissioners of Norton County v. Shoemaker, 27 Kan. 77; ... Harvey v. Commissioners of Rush ... [103 P. 767] ... County, 32 Kan. 159, 4 ... ...
-
Blaine County ex rel. Matthaei v. Pyrah
... ... will prevent the legislature from diminishing it during his ... term of office." (Harvey v. Rush Co. Commrs., ... 32 Kan. 159, 4 P. 153; 15 Dec. Dig. (Officers), sec. 100k.) ... ...
-
Board of Com'rs of Graham County v. Slyck
...is untenable; for to maintain such a theory would be at variance with the doctrine laid down by this court in the case of Harvey v. Comm'rs of Rush Co., 32 Kan. 159, authorities therein cited. The conclusion, therefore, is, that without an express provision of the statute that such transfer......