Hash by Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp. and Medical Center
Decision Date | 07 July 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 54570-7,54570-7 |
Citation | 757 P.2d 507,110 Wn.2d 912 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | Joanne Marie HASH, a Minor, by her Guardian ad Litem, Toni HASH, Respondent, v. CHILDREN'S ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, a corporation, Petitioner. |
Reed, McClure, Moceri, Thonn & Moriarty, William R. Hickman, Heather Houston Reeve, Seattle, for petitioner.
Miracle, Pruzan & Morrow, Howard P. Pruzan, Seattle, for respondent.
Philip J. VanDerhoef, Mr. John W. Schedler, Seattle, amicus curiae, on behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers Ass'n for Petitioner.
This is an action to determine the propriety of a summary judgment in favor of respondent Children's Orthopedic Hospital (COH) finding no liability for the fracture of the respondent Joanne Marie Hash's left femur during a physical therapy session. We affirm the Court of Appeals holding that the summary judgment was improper.
Joanne Marie Hash was a 6-year-old patient undergoing physical therapy for rheumatoid arthritis at COH when she suffered "a proximal shaft fracture with displacement of the left femur." Clerk's Papers, at 2. In her complaint Hash alleged that the fracture was caused by the negligence of the hospital through its physicians and physical therapists.
COH answered the complaint setting out several affirmative defenses, including the allegation that the fracture did not result from any negligence or wrongful conduct on the part of the COH.
On April 19, 1985, COH moved for summary judgment. The motion was supported by two affidavits of Dr. Carol A. Wallace, a pediatric rheumatologist licensed to practice in the state of Washington. In her March 20, 1985 affidavit Dr. Wallace stated that Hash had suffered from polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis since she was 2 1/2 years of age and had been referred to COH for "intensive physical therapy and surgical release of flexion contractures of the hip and knees"; that according to her medical history, Hash had progressed well at COH until her femur was fractured during a physical therapy session; that "[v]igorous and intensive physical therapy is a treatment of choice for patients with contractures due to muscle spasms"; that patients such as [Hash] have weaker bones than normal due to demineralization and that without vigorous physical therapy the patient's bones and range of motion can further deteriorate; and that "[a] vigorous physical therapy program for a patient such as [Hash] conforms to sound medical practice and to the standard of care of a reasonably prudent rheumatologist." Clerk's Papers, at 10-11. The affidavit concludes that "[t]he physical therapy program prescribed and administered to Joanne Hash at COH met the standard of reasonably prudent care in Washington in 1982." Clerk's Papers, at 11.
In her May 20, 1985 affidavit, Dr. Wallace added that Clerk's Papers, at 21-22.
COH did not submit an affidavit from the physical therapist treating Hash at the time of the injury, nor did it submit any other evidence setting forth its version of the facts surrounding the injury.
Hash did not submit affidavits or other evidence in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Instead, she relied on the argument that the affidavits submitted by COH were insufficient to establish that there were no genuine issues of material fact. In addition, respondent argued that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was sufficient in this case to raise a genuine issue of fact.
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of COH and dismissed Hash's claim, stating that in reaching its decision the court had considered only COH's motion for summary judgment and brief in support thereof, and Dr. Wallace' affidavits. Hash appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed holding that the affidavits upon which the trial court relied were insufficient to establish the absence of material fact because they did not provide specific facts showing how the fracture occurred. Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp., 49 Wash.App. 130, 135, 741 P.2d 584 (1987). COH seeks review of that decision. We accepted discretionary review.
This case presents the issue of whether a summary judgment may be properly granted to a defendant in a personal injury action based solely upon the allegation that it was not negligent, absent any statement of that party's version of the facts surrounding the injury. A motion for summary judgment shall be granted
if the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Keck v. Collins
...819 P.2d 370 (1991); Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 49 Wash.App. 130, 134–35, 741 P.2d 584 (1987), aff'd,110 Wash.2d 912, 757 P.2d 507 (1988). ¶ 46 Unlike the trial court, we reason at the outset that the so-called “negligent referral” claim is inseparable from appellants'......
-
Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle
...Inc., 122 Wash.2d 544, 859 P.2d 51 (1993).21 CR 56(c).22 Malnar, 128 Wash.2d at 535, 910 P.2d 455; Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 110 Wash.2d 912, 915, 757 P.2d 507 (1988); Barrie v. Hosts of Am., Inc., 94 Wash.2d 640, 618 P.2d 96 (1980).23 Malnar, 128 Wash.2d at 535, 910 ......
-
Seeley v. Roden
...that would raise an issue of material fact as to the partnership relationship or authorization. Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp. and Med. Ctr., 110 Wn.2d 912, 915, 757 P.2d 507 (1988). But, as we discussed above, the Seeleys presented no factual evidence regarding Wardle's knowledge of R......
-
Doe v. Dep't of Corr.
...398, 407, 259 P.3d 190 (2011).22 Hash v. Children's Orthopedic Hosp. , 49 Wash.App. 130, 134–35, 741 P.2d 584 (1987), aff'd , 110 Wash.2d 912, 757 P.2d 507 (1988).23 RCW 42.56.070(1).24 175 Wash.2d 837, 287 P.3d 523 (2012).25 See RCW 42.56.240.26 Berschauer/Phillips Constr. Co. v. Seattle S......
-
§56.6 Analysis
...not need to submit affidavits or responding materials unless the movant meets its burden. Hash v. Children's Ortho. Hosp. & Med. Ctr, 110 Wn.2d 912, 915, 757P.2d507 (1988); Preston, 55 Wn.2d at 682-83. If the movant does not meet its burden, summary judgment may not be entered, regardless o......
-
Table of Cases
...(1978): 19.3 Harvey v. Obermeit, 163 Wn.App. 311, 261 P.3d 671 (2011): 4.6(4)(d), 4.7(4)(h) Hash v. Children's Ortho. Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 110 Wn.2d 912, 757 P.2d 507 (1988): 56.6(4)(b) Haslund v. City of Seattle, 86 Wn.2d 607, 547 P.2d 1221 (1976): 8.6(4)(c), 8.7(3) Hatch v. Princess Louise ......