Hassall v. Wilcox
Decision Date | 22 April 1889 |
Parties | HASSALL v. WILCOX |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Silas W. Pettit, for appellant.
W. Hallett Phillips, for appellee.
On the 18th of February, 1879, an act was passed by the state of Texas, (Gen. Laws 1879, c. 12,) entitled 'An act to protect mechanics, laborers, and operatives on railroads against the failure of owners, contractors, and subcontractors or agents to pay their wages when due, and provide a lien for such wages,' which provided as follows:
On the 15th of May, 1882, the Rio Grande & Pecos Railway Company, a Texas corporation, made a mortgage to the Mercantile Trust Company of the state of New York, a New York corporation, covering all the property, real and personal, of the Texas corporation, including its franchises, lands, railways, and other property, to secure $600,000 of coupon bonds issued by it, dated June 1, 1882, payable in 30 years, and bearing semiannual annual interest at the rate of 6 per cent. per annum. On or prior to the 27th of March, 1884, A. W. Wilcox pre- sented a petition to the district court of the county of Webb, in the state of Texas, subscribed and sworn to by him before the clerk of that court, in the words following: The promissory note referred to in said petition was as follows:
On the 27th of March, 1884, the district court rendered the following judgment:
On the 14th of April, 1884, C. B. Wright, a citizen of Pennsylvania and a holder of $121,000 of the bonds, the interest on which, due December 1, 1883, had not been paid, filed a bill in equity in the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Texas, against the railway company and the Mercantile Trust Company, setting forth that the railway company was the owner of valuable coal lands in the county of Webb, and had recently constructed a railroad from Santo Tomas to Laredo; that the business of the railway was that of a railway and transportation company, and of a miner of coal; that recently there had been expended a large amount of money in opening the coal-beds, and erecting appliances for mining the coal and transporting it to market; that the principal business of the railroad was the transportation of the coal thus mined; that the value of the assets of the company consisted largely in the fact that the coal-mines and the railroad were owned by the same corporation; and that any separation of the two properties would be disastrous to the creditors of the company, and would lessen materially the aggregate value of the two properties. The bill then set forth the making of the bonds and the mortgage, and the interest of the plaintiff in the bonds; that the company had recently incurred a debt of between $20,000 and $40,000, in constructing and equipping the railroad; that, under the laws of Texas, such debt was entitled to a first lien on the road and its franchises and property, in preference to the first mortgage bondholders, for a period of 12 months after its completion; that, long before the expiration of 12 months from such completion, suits were brought upon many, if not upon all, 'of the labor and material claims above mentioned,' and judgment in some instances had been had thereon, on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ballard v. Hunter
...442; 61 Ark. 407; 60 Ark. 194, 414. No notice was given appellants, and the sales were void. 59 Ark. 513, 536; 96 U.S. 104; 64 Ark. 258; 130 U.S. 493; 431 F. 135 U.S. 85; 106 F. 474; 56 Ark. 93; 61 Ark. Peters, 471; 93 U.S. 274; 189 U.S. 433; 60 Ark. 369; 62 Ark. 439; 74 N.Y. 183; 164 U.S. ......
-
Columbia Ave Savings Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co. v. City of Dawson
... ... a party to the litigation. Keokuk & W. R. Co. v ... Missouri, 152 U.S. 301, 14 Sup.Ct. 592, 38 L.Ed. 450; ... Hassall v. Wilcox, 130 U.S. 493, 9 Sup.Ct. 590, 32 ... L.Ed. 1001; Louisville Trust Company v ... [130 F. 166] ... Cincinnati, ... 76 F ... ...
-
D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.
...upon them. Note to Pinney v. Investment Co., 50 L. R. A. 597;Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 U. S. 277,23 L. Ed. 914;Hassall v. Wilcox, 130 U. S. 493, 9 Sup. Ct. 590, 32 L. Ed. 1001;Dorr's Adm'r v. Rohr, 82 Va. 359, 3 Am. St. Rep. 106. And we have for consideration the question whether the publicati......
-
D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.
... ... service of summons upon them. Note to Pinney v ... Investment Co., 50 L.R.A. 597; Windsor v ... McVeigh, 93 U.S. 277, 23 L.Ed. 914; Hassall v ... Wilcox, 130 U.S. 493, 9 S.Ct. 590, 32 L.Ed. 1001; ... Dorr's Adm'r v. Rohr, 82 Va. 359, 3 Am. St ... 106. And we have for consideration ... ...