Hat-Sweat Mfg. Co. v. Waring

Citation46 F. 87
PartiesHAT-SWEAT MANUF'G CO. v. WARING et al.
Decision Date31 March 1891
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

John R. Bennett, for complainant.

Wetmore & Jenner, for defendants.

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Should the defense set up by the defendants be made out by the proof, they would be entitled to a decree not simply denying complainant's right to money damages, or an accounting, but also declaring the license upon which the suit is brought to be fraudulent and void, and directing its cancellation. The complainant is therefore, under the authorities, not entitled as of right to dismiss its own bill at this stage of the case. Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co., 44 F. 602; Stevens v. Railroads, 4 Fed.Rep. 97. Nor, under all the circumstances, should it be allowed to do so. If complainant suffers default, defendants may take a decree dismissing the complaint, declaring the license void, and directing its cancellation; but such decree will, of course, show upon its face that it was entered upon default. Should the complainant be unwilling to suffer default, the time to file briefs named in the former order is extended to and including April 6th, and they need not be printed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Young v. J. Samuels & Bro., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • April 6, 1916
    ...... circuit: Brush v. Condit (C.C.) 20 F. 826;. American Zylonite Co. v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C.C.). 32 F. 809; American Steel & Wire Co. v. Mayer (C.C.). 123 F. 204. . . ...(C.C.) 55 F. 569, 573; Electric Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co. (C.C.) 44 F. 602; Hat-Sweat. Mfg. Co. v. Waring (C.C.) 46 F. 87; Hershberger v. Blewett (C.C.) 55 F. 170; Callahan v. Hicks. ......
  • Long v. Anderson
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • July 13, 1904
    ...... Railroads (C. C.) 4 Fed. 97; Connecticut & P. R. R. Co. v. Hendee (C. C.) 27 F. 678; Hat-Sweat Mfg. Co. v. Waring (C. C.) 46 F. 87; Pullman's Palace Car. Co. v. Central Transp. Co. (C. C.) 49 ......
  • Nashua & L.R. Corporation v. Boston & L.R. Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • September 4, 1895
    ......489; Electric Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co., 44 F. 602; Manufacturing Co. v. Waring, 46 F. 87, 106; Hershberger v. Blewett,. 55 F. 170; City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.,. Id. ......
  • Russo-Asiatic Bank v. Guaranty Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • February 16, 1939
    ...would generally be denied. Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Union Rolling-Mill Co., 109 U.S. 702, 3 S.Ct. 594, 27 L.Ed. 1081; Hat-Sweat Mfg. Co. v. Waring, C.C.N.Y., 46 F. 87; Detroit v. Detroit City R. Co., C.C.Mich., 55 F. 569. In cases where the plaintiff's motion to discontinue and the defenda......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT