Hatter v. Iowa Men's Reformatory
| Decision Date | 01 May 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-1902,90-1902 |
| Parties | Bruce Allen HATTER, Appellant, v. IOWA MEN'S REFORMATORY, Attorney General, State of Iowa, Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Mark Meyer, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for appellant.
Thomas D. McGrane, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellees.
Before ARNOLD and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Bruce Hatter appeals the district court's 1 denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. 734 F.Supp. 1505. We affirm.
Hatter abducted his victim at knife point, handcuffed her, drove her about five miles to a rural area, and then forced her to perform a sexual act. After the attack, he returned his victim to town and freed her. A state court jury convicted Hatter of first degree kidnapping. As is mandatory under Iowa law, the court sentenced him to life imprisonment without parole. The conviction and sentence were upheld by the Iowa Supreme Court on direct appeal. State v. Hatter, 414 N.W.2d 333 (Iowa 1987). Hatter filed a petition in federal district court for habeas corpus relief and challenged his conviction and sentence on constitutional grounds. In a lengthy, comprehensive memorandum opinion, the district court denied relief.
Hatter contends that as applied to the facts in this case, the Iowa kidnapping statute is vague and that his crime of kidnapping was merely incidental to his sexual abuse of his victim. Hatter also argues that his confession should have been suppressed as involuntary. Finally, Hatter contends that the sentence of life imprisonment without parole is disproportionate to his crime and thus violates the eight amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
The Iowa Supreme Court has rejected the argument that the Iowa kidnapping statute is vague because of its failure to more narrowly define the confinement and asportation elements. State v. Rich, 305 N.W.2d 739, 745 (Iowa 1981). We agree with the district court that under the Iowa Supreme Court's interpretation of the Iowa statute, a reasonable person would be put on notice that the acts committed by Hatter would constitute the separate crimes of kidnapping and rape.
Hatter argues that the kidnapping of his victim was merely incidental to his sexual abuse of her, as was the case in State v. Marr, 316 N.W.2d 176, 180 (Iowa 1982). We agree with the district court that the facts in Hatter's case are not such that the confinement and removal elements of kidnapping could be considered merely incidental to the commission of sexual abuse. Hatter took his victim five miles to a secluded area, where she could not be heard and the attack would not be seen, before he committed the sexual assault. We agree with the district court that Hatter's conduct went well beyond mere confinement and removal and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Barraza
...to Simmons's crime of aiding and abetting the restraint and torture of her seven-year-old child."); Hatter v. Iowa Men's Reformatory, 932 F.2d 701, 702-703 (8th Cir.1991) (state sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole did not violate the Eighth Amendment when defendant k......
-
Simmons v. State of Iowa
...of first-degree kidnapping, although severe, is not so disproportionate as to violate the Eighth Amendment. Hatter v. Iowa Men's Reformatory, 932 F.2d 701, 703 (8th Cir.1991). 5 Simmons argues, however, that the punishment is unconstitutional as applied to the circumstances surrounding her ......
-
State Dakota v. Corean
...sentence for kidnapping is severe, but it is not "so disproportionate to the crime as to be unconstitutional." Hatter v. Iowa Men's Reformatory, 932 F.2d 701, 703 (8th Cir.1991). Even more to the point, the Eighth Circuit has found that a legislatively mandated life sentence for aiding and ......
-
White v. State
...claim. 734 F. Supp. at 1527. The federal district court's rulings were affirmed on appeal. Hatter v. Iowa Men's Reformatory, 932 F.2d 701, 702 (8th Cir. 1991). 5. The Cross opinion notes that the trial court "fashioned a more exacting definition of torture." 308 N.W.2d at 27. 6. The court s......