Hawkins v. Board of Control of Florida, 17116.

Decision Date09 April 1958
Docket NumberNo. 17116.,17116.
CitationHawkins v. Board of Control of Florida, 253 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1958)
PartiesVirgil D. HAWKINS, v. BOARD OF CONTROL OF FLORIDA, a body corporate, and R. S. Johnson, Registrar of the University of Florida.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Constance Baker Motley, Thurgood Marshall, Robert L. Carter, New York City, Francisco A. Rodriguez, Tampa, Fla., for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., Ralph E. Odum, Asst. Atty. Gen., John J. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the court below appellant filed a bill of complaint alleging that he was being deprived of admission to the law school of the University of Florida solely because he was of the Negro race.He moved for a preliminary injunction.This motion was regularly ordered for hearing and came on for hearing after due notice.At that hearing the District Court declined to permit appellant to introduce any evidence and denied the motion for preliminary injunction.1The question presented to us is whether the court erred in entering its order complained of.

Rule 65(b), F.R.C.P.,28 U.S. C.A., requires that a motion for a preliminary injunction"shall be set * * * for hearing * * *."Hearing requires a trial of an issue of fact.Trial of an issue of fact necessitates an opportunity to present evidence.Sims v. Greene, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 87.Since appellant was not given the opportunity to present evidence in his behalf, the order denying the preliminary injunction must be set aside.

In his complaint appellant alleges that he had been striving since 1949 to obtain admission to the state law school in question.Much of this time has been consumed in litigation in an effort to vindicate this asserted right.He prayed that the court advance this case on its docket and order a speedy hearing on the merits in order that, if entitled thereto, he...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Hershey Creamery Co. v. Hershey Chocolate Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 8, 1967
    ...Trial of an issue of fact necessitates an opportunity to present evidence. Sims v. Greene, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 87." Hawkins v. Board of Control, 253 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1958). Moreover, Rule 52(a) provides: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury * * *, the court shall find the fact......
  • NATIONAL ASS'N FOR ADVANCE. OF COLORED PEOPLE v. Gallion
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 15, 1961
    ...358 U.S. 639, 79 S.Ct. 455, 3 L.Ed.2d 562. The situation here is not, we think, comparable with that presented in Hawkins v. Board of Control, 5th Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 752. There Hawkins, a Negro, had been unsuccessfully attempting to obtain admission to the University of Florida Law School......
  • Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Rudio Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • September 10, 1965
    ...F.2d 5 (6th Cir. 1958); Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Callander, 256 F.2d 410 (5th Cir. 1958); Hawkins v. Board of Control of Florida, 253 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1958); and the following Federal District Court decisions: Paramount Pictures Corporation v. Holden, 166 F.Supp. 684 (S......
  • ITS Industria Tessuti Speciali v. Aerfab Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • May 16, 1967
    ...Trial of an issue of fact necessitates an opportunity to present evidence. Sims v. Greene, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 87." Hawkins v. Board of Control, 253 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1958). Moreover, Rule 52(a) provides: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury * * *, the court shall find the fact......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Reflections on justice before and after Brown.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 32 No. 1, December 2004
    • December 1, 2004
    ...U.S. 413, 413 (1956). When the Florida courts again delayed, the plaintiff filed a new suit in Tallahassee. Hawkins v. Board of Control, 253 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. (18.) In preparation for trial, we had spent two weeks looking at school records of white students who had been admitted at the tim......