Hawkins v. State, 39378
| Decision Date | 17 January 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 39378,39378 |
| Citation | 222 Miss. 753,77 So.2d 263 |
| Parties | Joseph HAWKINS v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Carl A. Chadwick, Berger & Callon, Natchez, for appellant.
J. P. Coleman, Atty. Gen., by Wm. E. Cresswell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Joseph Hawkins, was convicted in the County Court of Adams County of an attempt to rape Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, and sentenced to a term of nine years in the State penitentiary. From this judgment he appeals.
The appellant assigns and argues three main points for the reversal of this case: (1) That the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the indictment; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and against the overwhelming weight of the evidence; and (3) that the court erred in refusing to admit in evidence the results of a lie detector test given appellant.
The indictment, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: '* * * did unlawfully and designedly, with actual violence, make an assault upon the body of one Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, a female, and the said Joseph Hawkins therein did then and there lay hold of the body of the said Mrs Elizabeth Louise Jones upon the bed of the said Mrs. Elizabeth Louise Jones, then and there situate, with the felonious intent, design and endeavor, her, the said Mrs. Elizabeth Louis Jones, violently, knowingly, forcibly and against her will feloniously to ravish and carnally know.' (Emphasis ours.)
The grounds of the demurrer were that the indictment charged no offense known to the law; it does not allege sufficient overt acts from which an attempt to rape could be proven; and that it would be mere guesswork and surmise as to whether appellant intended to kill, injure, rob, or rape her.
The indictment was drawn under Section 2017 of the Mississippi Code of 1942, which provides in part as follows: 'Attempt to commit offense--how punished.--Every person who shall design and endeavor to commit an offense, and shall do any overt act toward the commission thereof, but shall fail therein, or shall be prevented from committing the same, * * *.'
In the case of State v. Wade, 102 Miss. 711, 59 So. 880, the State appealed from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to an indictment under this section (it was then Sec. 1049, Code of 1906). The indictment charged: '* * * that Ben Wade, Jr., in said county, on the 13th day of March, A.D. 1912, did unlawfully and designedly, with actual violence, make an assault upon the body of one Fannie Sample, a female, and said Ben Wade, Jr., therein did then and there lay hold of the body of the said Fannie Sample, and her, the said Fannie Sample, did then and there throw her, said Fannie Sample, upon the bed of said Fannie Sample, then and there situate, with the felonious intent, design, and endeavor her, the said Fannie Sample, violently, knowingly, forcibly, and against her will feloniously to ravish and carnally know, * * *.' (Emphasis ours.)
The Court, in holding that this indictment was sufficient to charge an attempt, said: 'In order to charge an attempt to commit a crime, it is only necessary to allege an attempt so to do, coupled with an act toward it, falling short of the thing intended.' As will be observed from the emphasized parts of the indictment in the instant case and in...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Catanese, 62184
...(1952); People v. York, 174 Cal.App.2d 305, 344 P.2d 811 (1959); People v. Becker, 300 Mich. 562, 2 N.W.2d 503 (1942); Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753, 77 So.2d 263 (1955); Commonwealth ex rel. Hunter v. Banmiller, 194 Pa.Super. 448, 169 A.2d 347 (1961); Davis v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 456, 3......
-
United States v. Ridling, Crim. A. No. 46732.
...920 (1963); State v. Bohner, 210 Wis. 651, 246 N.W. 314 (1933); People v. Becker, 300 Mich. 562, 2 N.W.2d 503 (1942); Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753, 77 So.2d 263 (1955); State v. Hollywood, 138 Mont. 561, 358 P.2d 437 (1960); Parker v. State, 164 Neb. 614, 83 N.W.2d 347 (1957); State v. F......
-
State v. Arnwine
...in which an exhaustive opinion was rendered; State v. Pusch, 77 N.D. 860, 46 N.W.2d 508 (Sup.Ct.1951) (murder); Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753, 77 So.2d 263 (Sup.Ct.1955) (attempted rape); Peterson v. State, 157 Tex.Cr. 255, 247 S.W.2d 110, 248 S.W.2d 130 (Crim.App.1952) (passing forged in......
-
House v. State, 54007
...v. State, 307 So.2d 557, 562 (Miss.1975); Mattox v. State, 240 Miss. 544, 128 So.2d 368, 371-72 (1961); and Hawkins v. State, 222 Miss. 753, 77 So.2d 263, 264-65 (1955). Whatever value hypnosis may have as an investigative aid, it is our view at this time that it does not have the status as......