Hawley v. United States Fairbanks
Decision Date | 07 May 1883 |
Citation | 108 U.S. 543,2 S.Ct. 846,27 L.Ed. 820 |
Parties | HAWLEY, County Clerk, etc., v. UNITED STATES ex rel. FAIRBANKS and others |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
J. K. Edsall and John B. Hawley, for plaintiff in error.
Thos. S. McClelland, for defendant in error.
On the fifth of April, 1872, the town of Amboy, Lee county, Illinois, issued a series of bonds in payment of a subscription voted by the voters of the town to the capital stock of the Chicago & Rock River Railroad Company. Both the subscription and bonds were authorized by the charter of the railroad company, approved March 24, 1869.
Sections 12 and 13 of this charter, which alone need be considered, are as follows:
By an act of the general assembly of Illinois 'to fund and provide for paying the railroad debts of counties, townships, cities, and towns,' passed and in force April 16, 1869, the holders of that class of securities were authorized to register them in the office of the auditor of public accounts of the state. Sections 4 and 5 of that act are as follows:
When the bonds of the town of Amboy were issued, the town clerk did not transmit to the county clerk the statement required by section 12 of the charter of the railroad company, but the president of the company caused them to be registered in the office of the auditor of public accounts in accordance with the provisions of the act of 1869. During the years 1872 and 1873 the auditor made the proper certificate under the registry law for the taxes to meet the interest for those years, and the taxes were extended by the county clerk in due form on the tax-collector's books, but before the collections were made certain tax-payers of the town obtained from the circuit court of Lee county an injunction against the county clerk, the county collector, and the town collector, restraining them from col- lecting the taxes that had already been assessed, and also restraining the same parties and the auditor of public accounts of the state from taking any steps for the levy or collection of any other taxes to pay either the principal or the interest of the bonds.
After this injunction was obtained, the relators, Fairbanks, Skinner, Thomas, and Wetmore, being severally holders and owners of certain of the bonds and coupons of the town, began separate suits against the town in the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois, to recover the amounts due them, respectively, on their coupons. These suits resulted in a judgment on the thirteenth of March, 1878, in favor of Fairbanks, for $2,449 damages and $36.12 costs; another, on the twenty-fourth of January, 1878, in favor of Skinner, for $2,018.50 damages and $47.10 costs; another, on the twenty-ninth of November, 1875, in favor of Thomas, for $866 damages and $43.90 costs; and two others in favor of Wetmore,—one on the seventeenth of December, 1875, for $3,836.14 and $50.40 costs, and the other, on the twentieth of June, 1876, for $1,058.33 damages and $31.50 costs.
These several judgments remain unpaid, and have all been duly audited and allowed by the auditing board of the town; but the town clerk, whose duty it is to certify to the county clerk, on or before the second Tuesday in August in each year, the amount of taxes to be levied and collected to pay the charges against the town for the current year, refused to certify the judgments, and kept himself concealed so as to avoid the process of the courts. The several plaintif...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. Mutual Fidelity Co.
... 123 F. 506 JONES et al. v. MUTUAL FIDELITY CO. No. 230. United States Circuit Court, D. Delaware. May 26, 1903 ... Syllabus ... Hawley v. Fairbanks, 108 U.S. 543 (2 Sup.Ct. 846, 27 ... L.Ed. 820), to compel ... ...
-
Craig v. Stacy
...jurisdiction on this court. Kitchen v. City of Clinton, 8 S.W. (2d) 602; Gilman v. Am. Producers, etc. Co., 180 Mass. 319; Hawley v. Fairbanks, 108 U.S. 543; Com. v. Chesapeake Railroad Co., 128 Ky. 542; Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Com., 153 Ky. 507; Fink v. Denny, 75 Va. 633; Priest v. Deaver, 21......
-
Abs Ins., Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
...U.S. 264, 6 S.Ct. 40, 29 L.Ed. 377 (1885); Stewart v. Dunham, 115 U.S. 61, 5 S.Ct. 1163, 29 L.Ed. 329 (1885); Hawley v. Fairbanks, 108 U.S. 543, 2 S.Ct. 846, 27 L.Ed. 820 (1883); Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Waterman, 106 U.S. 265, 1 S.Ct. 131, 27 L.Ed. 115 (1882); Russell v. Stansell, 105 ......
-
Clapp v. Otoe County, Neb.
... 104 F. 473 CLAPP v. OTOE COUNTY, NEB. No. 1,324. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. October 9, 1900 ... 768; Supervisors ... v. Durant, 9 Wall. 415, 19 L.Ed. 732; Hawley v ... Fairbanks, 108 U.S. 543, 2 Sup.Ct. 846, 27 L.Ed. 820 ... Nor ... ...