Hayes v. Baker
| Decision Date | 07 October 1996 |
| Citation | Hayes v. Baker, 648 N.Y.S.2d 158, 232 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996) |
| Parties | Patricia HAYES, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Ross BAKER, etc., Defendant, Village of Rockville Centre, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Jacobson & Schwartz, Rockville Centre (Robert M. Bridges, of counsel), for appellant.
Feder, Connick & Goldstein, P.C., Mineola (Morton H. Feder and Ted J. Tanenbaum, of counsel), for respondents.
Before JOY, J.P., and ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN and KRAUSMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Village of Rockville Centre appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated July 13, 1995, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Village of Rockville Centre.
The infant plaintiff was allegedly sexually abused by the defendant Ross Baker while Baker was babysitting for the child. Baker was hired by the child's mother, the plaintiff Patricia Hayes, after she obtained his name, as well as other names, from a community service referral program sponsored by the Department of Parks and Recreation of the defendant Village of Rockville Centre (hereinafter the Village). The program was established to make services such as lawn mowing, snow shovelling, house cleaning and babysitting available to community residents and to facilitate part-time employment for youths in the Village. To participate in the program, a youth completed a form indicating the types of work in which he or she was interested. The Village maintained lists of the youths who registered for the program by job categories. A resident seeking a particular service could then call for a referral and would be provided with the names of several...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Gwendolyn Gray v. Wackenhut Serv.
...47 (2009) (complaint against art appraiser failed to state a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation); Hayes v. Baker, 232 A.D.2d 371, 648 N.Y.S.2d 158, 159 (1996) (no special relationship between the Village of Rockville Center and parents who hired a babysitter from a list maintai......
-
Lunal Realty Llc v. Disanto Realty Llc
...was no fiduciary or special relationship between Michael A. and the plaintiffs in this arms-length transaction ( see Hayes v. Baker, 232 A.D.2d 371, 372, 648 N.Y.S.2d 158; Chambers v. Executive Mtge. Corp., 229 A.D.2d 416, 417, 645 N.Y.S.2d 91; Pappas v. Harrow Stores, 140 A.D.2d 501, 528 N......
-
Estevez-Yalcin v. Children's Village
...because they cannot establish that the alleged misrepresentations proximately caused their injuries. See Hayes v. Baker, 232 A.D.2d 371, 648 N.Y.S.2d 158, 159 (2d Dep't 1996) (town not liable on negligent misrepresentation claim for injuries caused to child by babysitter referred by town's ......
-
Albano v. Dersovitz
...direct and proximate cause of the losses claimed (see, Wall St. Corp. v. Ziff Communications Co., 225 A.D.2d 322 [fraud claim]; Hayes v. Baker, 232 A.D.2d 371 [negligent misrepresentation claim]; R.M. Newell Co. v. Rice, 236 A.D.2d 843, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 807 [breach of fiduciary duty cla......