Hayes v. Mongiovi

Decision Date08 November 1973
Citation125 N.J.Super. 413,311 A.2d 207
PartiesZephyr HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benedetto MONGIOVI, t/a Mom Butcher Shop and/or Victory Mortgage Corp., Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Emanuel S. Fish, Maplewood, for appellant.

No brief was filed on behalf of respondent.

Before Judges LEONARD, ALLCORN and CRAHAY.

PER CURIAM.

In this case involving personal injuries received by a person who was knocked down by a 150-pound Great Dane dog, we affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the trial judge in his written opinion reported at 121 N.J.Super. 272, 296 A.2d 567 (Law Div.1972).

On this appeal plaintiff argues alternatively that solely by reason of the size of the dog, defendant-owner should be held as an insurer of any person knocked down thereby, without the necessity of showing Scienter. This point lacks merit. See Groner v. Hedrick, 403 Pa. 148, 169 A.2d 302 (Sup.Ct.1961).

Francois v. Hanff, 77 N.J.L. 364, 71 A. 1128 (Sup.Ct.1909), relied upon by plaintiff, concerns runaway horses and is inapposite.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT