Haygood v. Younger, s. 81-4686
| Decision Date | 28 March 1984 |
| Docket Number | 82-3111 and 82-5328,Nos. 81-4686,s. 81-4686 |
| Citation | 729 F.2d 613 |
| Parties | Frank HAYGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Evelle J. YOUNGER, etc., Defendants, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour, Defendants-Appellants. L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Zollie KELMAN, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls, Montana, a municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees. James PIATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ellis MacDOUGALL, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
William George Prahl, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants in No. 81-4686.
Jack Jacobson, Santa Cruz, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 81-4686.
L.R. Bretz, Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellant in No. 82-3111.
William Conklin, Gregory H. Warner, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees in No. 82-3111.
James Piatt, in pro. per.
Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee in No. 82-5328.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ramos v. Gallo
...Bordelon, 740 F.2d 329, 334-38 (5th Cir.1984); Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472, 1478-81 (9th Cir.1983), reh'g en banc granted, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir.1984); Daniels v. Williams, 720 F.2d 792, 796 (4th Cir.1983) and to intentional deprivations of liberty. See, e.g., Ellis v. Hamilton, 669 F......
-
Sierra Club v. Watt
...protected (i.e., life, liberty, or property)"; Haygood v. Younger, 527 F.Supp. 808, 812 (E.D.Cal.1981), hearing en banc ordered, 729 F.2d 613. "Once it is determined that due process applies, the question remains what process is due." Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2......
-
Garcia v. County of Los Angeles
... ... Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir.1983); Bretz v. Kelman, 722 F.2d 503 (9th Cir.1983). The ... ...
-
Haygood v. Younger
...808 (E.D.Cal.1981). Our panel decision reversed that judgment. Haygood v. Younger, 718 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir.1983), withdrawn, 729 F.2d 613 (9th Cir.1984). Because this case presents important questions about the scope of due process available to state prisoners, we took it with two others for......