Haynes v. State
Citation | 294 Ala. 758,312 So.2d 414 |
Parties | In re Grover Donald HAYNES v. STATE. Ex parte Grover Donald Haynes. SC 1227. |
Decision Date | 01 May 1975 |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Donald W. Stewart, Anniston, for petitioner.
Petition of Grover Donald Haynes for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Haynes v. State, 54 Ala.App. 714, 312 So.2d 406.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial11 cases
-
Dickerson v. State
......denied, 342 So.2d 947 (Ala.1977); Smith v. State, 335 So.2d 393 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 335 So.2d 397 (Ala.1976); McKenzie v. State, 57 Ala.App. 69, 326 So.2d 135 (1976); Hill v. State, 56 Ala.App. 369, 321 So.2d 708, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 405, 321 So.2d 713 (1975); Haynes v. State, 54 Ala.App. 714, 312 So.2d 406, cert. denied, 294 Ala. 758, 312 So.2d 414 (1975); Peppers v. State, 53 Ala.App. 695, 304 So.2d 39, cert. denied, 293 Ala. 770, 304 So.2d 43 (1974). . Thus, we consider the definition of cannabis as used in § 20-2-80(1) the same as the ......
-
State v. Calhoun
....... "It is to be noted that possession of marijuana includes the lesser offense of possession of marijuana for personal use (Title 22, § 258(47) only is a misdemeanor offense embraced in a felony charge of possession of marihuana. This inclusion is by operation of law. Haynes v. State, 54 Ala.App. 714, 312 So.2d 406, cert. denied 294 Ala. 758, 312 So.2d 414." . Page 800 . Coleman v. State, 344 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Ala.Crim.App.1977). . "An indictment charging possession of marijuana includes the lesser offense of possession of marijuana ......
-
Collier v. State
...... "Marijuana" is the older more general term used for "marihuana" as defined in Section 20-2-2(15). Haynes v. State, 54 Ala.App. 714, 312 So.2d 406, cert. denied, 294 Ala. 758, 312 So.2d 414 (1975). The incriminating ingredient of tetrahydrocannabinol, THC, is the chemical the possession of which is condemned by statute. McKenzie v. State, 57 Ala.App. 69, 326 So.2d 135 (1976). Haynes, supra. Ms. ......
-
Campbell v. State
......Page 1298. defined by law" and that for this reason "Appellant's conviction is due to be reversed." This proposition was decided adversely to appellant in Haynes v. State, Ala.Crim.App., 54 Ala.App. 714, 312 So.2d 406, 414, cert. denied, 294 Ala. 758, 312 So.2d 414 (1975), in which a headnote by West summarized the holding as follows:. "In light of fact that indictment charged possession of 'marijuana,' which is the older, more general term comprehending ......
Request a trial to view additional results