Haynes v. United States
| Decision Date | 12 June 1967 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 1474,1474 |
| Citation | 87 S.Ct. 2130,388 U.S. 908,18 L.Ed.2d 1347 |
| Parties | Miles Edward HAYNES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Charles Alan Wright, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson, for the United States.
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 181.
To continue reading
Request your trial
33 cases
-
Haynes v. United States
...372 F.2d 651. We granted certiorari to examine the constitutionality under the Fifth Amendment of petitioner's conviction. 388 U.S. 908, 87 S.Ct. 2130, 18 L.Ed.2d 1347. For reasons which follow, we Section 58513 forms part of the National Firearms Act, an interrelated statutory system for t......
-
U.S. v. Mason
... Page 1263 ... 658 F.2d 1263 ... 9 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 242 ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, ... Michael Warren MASON, Defendant-Appellant ... UNITED ... ...
-
Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. Thompson
... ... offending communication, a November 14, 1994 letter 6 written on its letterhead which (a) states that CALA was formed to change the "Constitution in a manner which will materially reduce the ... United States, 326 U.S. 1, 20, 65 S.Ct. 1416, 1424-25, 89 L.Ed. 2013 (1945). "Strong and effective ... at 1099 (citing Kirschstein v. Haynes, 1990 OK 8, 788 P.2d 941, 948, Hammett v. Hunter, 189 Okl. 455, 117 P.2d 511 (1941)). (b) Wright, ... ...
-
Biggers v. Neil, 20540.
...696 (1967), reh. denied March 1, 1967. An appeal to the United States Supreme Court followed. Certiorari was granted, 388 U.S. 909, 87 S.Ct. 2132, 18 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1967), and the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee by an equally divided Court. Biggers v. Te......
Request a trial to view additional results