Headwaters Forest Def. v. Co. of Humboldt, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

Decision Date04 May 2000
Docket NumberPLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
Citation211 F.3d 1121
Parties(9th Cir. 2000) HEADWATERS FOREST DEFENSE, PLAINTIFF, AND MOLLY BURTON; VERNELL "SPRING" M. LUNDBERG; MICHAEL MCCURDY; ERIC SAMUEL NEUWIRTH; MAYA PORTUGAL; LISA MARIE SANDERSONNO. FOX; JENNIFER SCHNEIDER; TERRI SLANETZ; NOEL TENDICK,, v. THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DENNIS LEWIS, SHERIFF; GARY PHILP, CHIEF DEPUTY; MARVIN KIRKPATRICK, DEPUTY; JOHN SYLVIA, DEPUTY; CIARBELLINI, SGT.; CITY OF EUREKA, A POLITICAL DIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; EUREKA POLICE DEPT; BILL HONSAL, CAPTAIN; JAMES MANOS, SGT., 98-17250
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 240 F.3d 1185.

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • Gelow v. Central Pacific Mortg. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • August 28, 2009
    ...States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam)); see also Headwaters Forest Def. v. County of Humboldt, 211 F.3d 1121, 1132 (9th Cir. 2000). Nevertheless, inferences are not drawn out of the air, and it is the opposing party's obligation to produ......
  • Glow v. Union Pacific R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • August 26, 2009
    ...States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam)); see also Headwaters Forest Def. v. County of Humboldt, 211 F.3d 1121, 1132 (9th Cir. 2000). Nevertheless, inferences are not drawn out of the air, and it is the opposing party's obligation to produ......
  • Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health and Rehabilitation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • November 12, 2004
    ...States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam)); See also Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt, 211 F.3d 1121, 1132 (9th Cir.2000). Nevertheless, inferences are not drawn out of the air, and it is the opposing party's obligation to pro......
  • Capizzi v. County of Placer
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • March 26, 2001
    ...States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam)); See also Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt, 211 F.3d 1121, 1132 (9th Cir.2000). Nevertheless, inferences are not drawn out of the air, and it is the opposing party's obligation to pro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT