Heale v. United States, 11075.
| Decision Date | 19 October 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 11075.,11075. |
| Citation | 207 F.2d 414 |
| Parties | Nola S. HEALE v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Benjamin Forman, Washington, D. C. (Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Grover C. Richman, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Stuart B. Rounds, Asst. U. S. Atty., Trenton, N. J., Samuel D. Slade, Attorney, Department of Justice, on the brief), for petitioner.
John Warren, Jr., Red Bank, N. J. (Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona, & Combs, Red Bank, N. J., on the brief), for respondent.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
A judgment against the United States cannot be sustained upon a theory of absolute liability. Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15, 44-45, 73 S.Ct. 956. Since the court below made no express finding as to negligent conduct on the part of the United States it is necessary to vacate the judgment and remand to the end that appropriate findings may be made. We make it plain, however, that we do not pass upon the question whether the record would or would not sustain a finding of negligence against the United States. This is a matter which rests with the trial court.
The judgment appealed from will be vacated and the case is remanded with the direction to proceed in accordance with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Taylor
...172 F.2d 500; Hubsch v. United States, 5 Cir., 1949, 174 F.2d 7; United States v. Eleazer, 4 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 914; Heale v. United States, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 414; Rayonier Incorporated v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 225 F.2d We turn then to the controlling issue. Were the Air Force......