Healy v. Ratta
| Decision Date | 20 February 1933 |
| Docket Number | No. 669,669 |
| Citation | 77 L.Ed. 971,53 S.Ct. 401,288 U.S. 593 |
| Parties | Michael J. HEALY, Chief of Police of the City of Manchester, New Hampshire appellant, v. Louis D. RATTA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Thornton Lorimer, of Rochester, N. H., for appellant.
Mr. William N. Rogers, of Concord, N. H., for appellee.
For opinion below, see 1 F. Supp. 669.
In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. The Court desires to hear argument upon the questions: (a) whether a case for equitable relief is shown; (b) whether the amount in controversy is such as to sustain the jurisdiction of the Court below; and (c) whether the defendant-appellant is a state officer within the meaning of section 266, Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938, U. S. Code, title 28, § 380 [28 USCA § 380]). The motion to advance is granted and the case is assigned for argument on Monday, March 13, next, after the cases heretofore assigned for that day.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Patterson v. New York
- Lublin v. Central Islip Psychiatric Center
- Morrison v. People of State of California
-
State of Washington v. State of Oregon
...directions to make findings of fact and conclusions of law to be submitted to the court with recommendations for a decree. 288 U.S. 592, 53 S.Ct. 399, 77 L.Ed. 971. The case is now here upon exceptions filed by Washington to the master's report, which finds the facts fully and advises the d......