Heaphy v. United States Treasury Department, 277
Decision Date | 10 January 1974 |
Docket Number | Docket 73-1541.,No. 277,277 |
Citation | 489 F.2d 735 |
Parties | Robert E. HEAPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT, BUREAU OF CUSTOMS, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Robert E. Heaphy, pro se.
Taggart D. Adams, Asst. U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York (Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, Samuel J. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the judgment on Judge Tyler's opinion below, 354 F.Supp. 396 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Calo v. Paine, Civ. No. H-74-269.
...355 F.Supp. 1008 (C.D.Cal.1973); Heaphy v. United States Treasury Dept., Bureau of Customs, 354 F.Supp. 396 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd, 489 F.2d 735 (2d Cir. 1974). But cf. Abeyta v. Town of Taos, 499 F.2d 323 (10th Cir. 1974); Perkins v. Regents of University of Calif., 353 F.Supp. 618 (C.D.Cal......
-
Templeton v. Veterans Admin.
...1332, 1335 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Heaphy v. United States Treas. Dep't, 354 F.Supp. 396, 399, 402 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd on opinion below, 489 F.2d 735 (2d Cir. 1974). The VA satisfied the procedures established by the applicable regulations by notifying plaintiff by letter of the agency's conclusi......
-
Smith v. Lehman, 24
...94 S.Ct. 937, 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974); Heaphy v. United States Treasury Department, 354 F.Supp. 396, 399-401 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd, 489 F.2d 735 (2d Cir. 1974). Accordingly, Smith cannot demonstrate a sufficient property interest to trigger due process protections. See Board of Regents v. Ro......
-
Weathers v. West Yuma County School Dist. R-J-1
...See Beatham v. Manson, 369 F.Supp. 783 (D.Conn.1973); Heaphy v. United States Treasury Dep't, 354 F.Supp. 396 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd 489 F.2d 735 (1974). Factual distinctions between these cases and the one at hand are self-evident. Several cited cases, however, do give some general support ......