Hearst v. Hearst
Decision Date | 26 February 1957 |
Citation | 3 A.D.2d 706,159 N.Y.S.2d 753 |
Parties | Sandra Rambeau HEARST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George R. HEARST, Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
I. I. Erdheim, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
R. G. Zeller, New York City, for defendant-respondent.
Before PECK, P. J., and BREITEL, VALENTE and BASTOW, JJ.
Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed with costs and disbursements to the respondent. While the fixation of temporary alimony is never determinative of the fact or quantum of the obligation to support as it may be resolved after plenary trial, there is on this record no showing of prejudicial error. A wife is not entitled to share in a husband's income as such, but is entitled to support on the basis of the established standard of living, if otherwise reasonable, within the income of the husband. There are also many other factors to be considered. See e.g.,Phillips v. Phillips, 1 A.D.2d 393, 150 N.Y.S.2d 646. Plaintiff shows on this record, and in her argument, only that the husband has an income many times larger than the permanent alimony allotted to her. That is not enough. Order filed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kover v. Kover
...569, 570; see, also, Burr v. Burr, 7 Hill 207, 211; cf. Hearst v. Hearst, 3 N.Y.2d 967, 169 N.Y.S.2d 36, 146 N.E.2d 792, affg. 3 A.D.2d 706, 159 N.Y.S.2d 753.) But, as the Appellate Division noted in 1956 in Phillips v. Phillips (1 A.D.2d 393, 395, 150 N.Y.S.2d 646, 649, affd. 2 N.Y.2d 742,......
-
Millner v. Millner
...the pre-separation standard of living of the parties--and the authorities are agreed that this cannot be done. Thus, in Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A.D.2d 706, 159 N.Y.S.2d 753, aff'd 3 N.Y.2d 967, 169 N.Y.S.2d 36, 146 N.E.2d 792, noting (of course) that there were other factors also to be consider......
-
Orenstein v. Orenstein
...207 N.Y.S.2d 940, 942, affd. 13 A.D.2d 924, 216 N.Y.S.2d 307, affd. 11 N.Y.2d 693, 225 N.Y.S.2d 763, 180 N.E.2d 915; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A.D.2d 706, 159 N.Y.S.2d 753.) We reduced as excessive an award of temporary alimony in this case (24 A.D.2d 753, 263 N.Y.S.2d 879) from $175 per week, pl......
-
Kay v. Kay
...to maintain it, provides the standard for permanent alimony payments. (Tirrell v. Tirrell, 232 N.Y. 224, 133 N.E. 569; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A.D.2d 706, 159 N.Y.S.2d 753, affd. 3 N.Y.2d 967, 169 N.Y.S.2d 36, 146 N.E.2d 792; Hunter v. Hunter, 10 A.D.2d 291, 198 N.Y.S.2d 1008; Bittson v. Bittso......