Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp. v. Midwest Div., Civil Action No. 05-2164-MLB.

Decision Date01 October 2007
Docket NumberCivil Action No. 05-2164-MLB.
Citation527 F.Supp.2d 1257
PartiesHEARTLAND SURGICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MIDWEST DIVISION, INC. d/b/a HCA Midwest Division, et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Kansas

M. McGuire, Virginia Stevens Crimmins, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff.

Brian E. Kowalski, Eric J. McCarthy, Margaret M.L. Zwisler, Marguerite M. Sullivan, Latham & Watkins, Washington, DC, David E. Everson, Jr., R. Kent Sullivan, Russell J. Keller, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Jeffrey J. Simon, Leonard L. Wagner, M. Jared Marsh, Michael S. Hargens, William A. Lynch, Husch & Eppenberger, LLC, Floyd R. Finch, Jr., Laura K. Brooks, Shelley A. Runion, Blackwell Sanders LLP, John D. Seaton, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, LC, John M. McFarland, Scott E. Harvison, Kutak Rock LLP, David A. Jermann, II, Edward R. Spalty, Gerald A. King, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Kansas City, MO, Allen Spencer Boston, David B. Helms, Richard. B. Walsh, Jr., Winthrop B. Reed, III, Lewis, Rice & Fingersh, LC, St. Louis, MO, David A. Ettinger, Peter E. Boivin, Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn, Detroit, MI, Harry Christopher Goplerud, Honigman Miller Schwartz Dand Cohn LLP, Tampa, FL, Lara Fetsco Phillip, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.

                TABLE OF CONTENTS
                  I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 1263
                 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................... 1263
                III. FACTS ................................................................. 1264
                     A. The Healthcare Industry ............................................ 1265
                     B. Heartland .......................................................... 1266
                     C. The Individual Defendants .......................................... 1267
                        1. Aetna ........................................................... 1267
                        2. Coventry ........................................................ 1267
                        3. Blue Cross ...................................................... 1267
                        4. United .......................................................... 1267
                        5. Cigna ........................................................... 1268
                        6. Humana .......................................................... 1268
                        7. HCA Midwest ..................................................... 1268
                        8. Saint Luke's .................................................... 1268
                        9. Shawnee Mission Medical Center .................................. 1268
                        10. North Kansas City Hospital ..................................... 1268
                        11. Carondelet ..................................................... 1268
                     D. Contractual Relationships Between the Defendants ................... 1268
                        1. Aetna's Relationships ........................................... 1268
                           a. Aetna—HCA Midwest ............................................ 1268
                           b. Aetna—Saint Luke's ........................................... 1270
                           c. Aetna—Shawnee Mission Medical Center ......................... 1270
                           d. Aetna—North Kansas City Hospital ............................. 1270
                           e. Aetna—Carondelet ............................................. 1270
                        2. Coventry's Relationships ........................................ 1271
                           a. Coventry—HCA Midwest ......................................... 1271
                           b. Coventry—Saint Luke's ........................................ 1272
                           c. Coventry—Shawnee Mission Medical Center ...................... 1273
                           d. Coventry—North Kansas City Hospital .......................... 1274
                           e. Coventry—Carondelet .......................................... 1274
                        3. Blue Cross's Relationships ...................................... 1274
                           a. Blue Cross—HCA Midwest ....................................... 1274
                           b. Blue Cross—Saint Luke's ...................................... 1275
                           c. Blue Cross—Shawnee Mission Medical Center .................... 1275
                
                           d. Blue Cross—North Kansas City Hospital ........................ 1275
                           e. Blue Cross—Carondelet ........................................ 1275
                        4. United's Relationships .......................................... 1275
                           a. United—HCA Midwest ........................................... 1275
                           b. United—Saint Luke's .......................................... 1275
                           c. United—Shawnee Mission Medical Center ........................ 1275
                           d. United—North Kansas City Hospital ............................ 1275
                           e. United—Carondelet ............................................ 1276
                        5. Cigna's Relationships ........................................... 1276
                           a. Cigna—HCA Midwest ............................................ 1276
                           b. Cigna—Saint Luke's ........................................... 1276
                           c. Cigna—Shawnee Mission Medical Center ......................... 1276
                           d. Cigna—North Kansas City Hospital ............................. 1276
                           e. Cigna—Carondelet ............................................. 1276
                        6. Humana's Relationships .......................................... 1276
                           a. Humana—HCA Midwest ........................................... 1276
                           b. Humana—Saint Luke's .......................................... 1277
                           c. Humana—Shawnee Mission Medical Center ........................ 1277
                           d. Humana—North Kansas City Hospital ............................ 1277
                           e. Humana—Carondelet ............................................ 1277
                     E. Heartland's Attempts to Obtain MCO Contracts ....................... 1277
                        1. Aetna ........................................................... 1277
                        2. Coventry ........................................................ 1278
                        3. Blue Cross ...................................................... 1280
                        4. United, Cigna, and Humana ....................................... 1280
                     F. Defendants' Internal Expressions Concerning Specialty Hospitals .... 1280
                        1. MCO Defendants .................................................. 1280
                        2. Hospital Defendants ............................................. 1281
                           a. HCA Midwest .................................................. 1281
                           b. Saint Luke's ................................................. 1282
                           c. Shawnee Mission Medical Center ............................... 1282
                           d. Carondelet ................................................... 1283
                     G. Communications Between and Amongst Defendants ...................... 1283
                     H. Common Group Associations of Defendants ............................ 1288
                        1. Classic Cup Dinners ............................................. 1288
                        2. Ingram's Magazine Meeting ....................................... 1289
                        3. HFMA Meeting .................................................... 1289
                     I. Motion to Strike ................................................... 1290
                 IV. GENERAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS .................................... 1292
                  V. ANALYSIS .............................................................. 1292
                     A. Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 ........................................... 1292
                        1. Heartland's Styling of its § 1 Claim .............................. 1292
                        2. Standards of Law and Summary Judgment on a § 1 Claim .............. 1295
                        3. Analysis of Heartland's § 1 Claim ................................. 1298
                           a. Direct Evidence .............................................. 1298
                           b. Economic Motive .............................................. 1302
                           c. Circumstantial Evidence ...................................... 1303
                        4. Individual Defendants' Participation ............................ 1309
                           a. Aetna's Participation ........................................ 1309
                           b. Coventry's Participation ..................................... 1313
                           c. HCA Midwest's Participation .................................. 1315
                           d. Saint Luke's Participation ................................... 1317
                           e. Shawnee Mission Medical Center's Participation ............... 1319
                           f. Carondelet's Participation ................................... 1320
                        5. Conclusion—Sherman Act .......................................... 1321
                     B. Tortious Interference with a Prospective Business Relationship ..... 1322
                     C. Civil Conspiracy ................................................... 1325
                
                 VI. CONCLUSION ............................................................ 1325
                
I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on defendants Aetna Health Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company's (collectively "Aetna's") motion for summary judgment (Does. 777, 778); defendants Coventry Health Care of Kansas, Inc., Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company, and SouthCare PPO, Inc.'s (collectively "Coventry's") motion for summary judgment (Does. 848, 852); and defendants Midwest Division, Inc. d/b/a HCA Midwest Division ("HCA Midwest"), Saint Luke's Health System, Inc. ("Saint Luke's"), Carondelet Health, St. Joseph Medical Center, St. Mary's Medical Center (collectively "Carondelet"), and Shawnee Mission Medical Center, Inc.'s ("Shawnee Mission Medical Center's") joint motion for partial summary judgment (Does. 834, 835).

The motions have been fully briefed1 (Does. 833, 899, 901, 920, 921) and the court held oral argument on the motions on September 27, 2007.

The motions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Omnicare, Inc. v. Unitedhealth Group, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • January 16, 2009
    ...were discussed between PacifiCare and UnitedHealth. For this reason, Omnicare's reliance on Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Midwest Div., Inc., 527 F.Supp.2d 1257 (D.Kan.2007) is misplaced. Summary judgment was denied in that case because the defendants "communicated to each othe......
  • Beltran v. InterExchange, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • March 31, 2016
    ...Distributors were among the ‘other customers' which were part of the agreement.”); Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp., LLC v. Midwest Div., Inc. , 527 F.Supp.2d 1257, 1301 (D.Kan.2007) (emphasis added) (citing Champagne Metals , 458 F.3d at 1084, and characterizing testimony regarding an al......
  • Peer Assocs. v. Dep't of Human Servs.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • June 16, 2023
    ... ... Petitioner's request was not an "agency action" ... under 55 Pa. Code § 41.31(a), and ... (M.D. Tenn. 2015); Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp. v ... Midwest ... ...
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Insurance Antitrust Handbook. Third Edition
    • December 5, 2017
    ...Inc. v. Healthsource, Inc., 986 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1993), 135 Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp. v. Midwest Division, Inc., 527 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Kan. 2007), 135 Heary Bros. Lightning Prot. Co. v. Lightning Prot. Inst . , 287 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (D. Ariz. 2003), 78, 79 Heary Bros. Lightning......
  • Provider Relationships
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Insurance Antitrust Handbook. Third Edition
    • December 5, 2017
    ...of the relevant provider market, the court found no “significant foreclosure unreasonably restricting competitors.” 591 585 . 527 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Kan. 2007). 586 . Id. at 1308-09. 587 . Id. at 1303-04. 588 . Id. at 1304. 589 . The market foreclosure test used in determining the legalit......
  • Regulated Industries
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Premium Library Antitrust Law Developments (Ninth) - Volume II
    • February 2, 2022
    ...Nat’l LLC, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91415, *5-6 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). But cf. Heartland Surgical Specialty Hosp. v. Midwest Div. Inc., 527 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Kan. 2007) (denying summary judgment on claims that multiple traditional hospitals and multiple managed care organizations allegedly agreed......
  • Nonprice Conduct in Health Care Industries
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition
    • February 1, 2010
    ...of [plaintiff] have a financial incentive to refer patients to [plaintiff].” 7d. 294. 295. 296. 349 F. Supp. 2d 389 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). 527 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (D. Kan. 591 F.3d 591 (8th Cir. 2009), aff’g, 573 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (B.D. Ark. 2008). 278 Antitrust Health Care Handbook Cross plan based ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT