Heath v. Maddock
| Decision Date | 17 November 1913 |
| Citation | 91 A. 1069 |
| Parties | HEATH v. MADDOCK. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Prerogative Court. Suit by Carlotta Heath against Frederick R. Haddock for revocation of letters of guardianship. From a decree of the Prerogative Court, reversing a judgment for petitioner (81 N. J. Eq. 470, 86 Atl. 945), petitioner appeals. Affirmed.
Edward A. & William T. Day, of Newark, for appellant. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, of Newark, for respondent.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion tiled in the court below by the ordinary.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Bartel v. Clarenbach
... ... This statute is directory and not mandatory. In re Tarby, 25 N.J.Super. 236, 95 A.2d 774 (Cty.Ct.1953); Heath v. Maddock, 81 N.J.Eq. 469, 86 A. 945 (Prerog.1913), aff'd 82 N.J.Eq. 366, 91 A. 1069 (E. & A.1913). Nonetheless, after studying the account ... ...
-
Austin v. Millard
... ... Pennell, 37 N.J.Super. 558, 117 A.2d 637 (App.Div.1955); Gillette v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 91 N.J.L. 220, 102 A. 673 (E. & A. 1917); Heathillette v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 91 N.J.L. 220, 102 A. 673 (E. & A. 1917); Heath v. Maddock ... ...