Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-800-335-6202

Heathcoat v. Potts

Cited in 4 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
Citation880 F.2d 419
PartiesHeathcoat v. Potts NO. 88-7258
Decision Date21 June 1989
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)

Page 419

880 F.2d 419

Heathcoat v. Potts

NO. 88-7258

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

JUN 21, 1989

Appeal From: N.D.Ala.

EVERSED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Lunsford v. Price
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • September 22, 1989
    ...received FECA benefits. FECA is the exclusive remedy for TVA employees. Thus, appellants' action here is barred. See Heathcoat v. Potts, 880 F.2d 419 (11th Cir.1989) ("[T]here can be no doubt, in light of the underlying legislative history, that section 9 [of FELRTCA] permits the TVA, as pa......
  • Heathcoat v. Potts, 89-7751
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • July 9, 1990
    ...Ervin, 484 U.S. 292, The denial of these post-trial motions gave rise to our second review of this case in Heathcoat v. Potts, 880 F.2d 419 (11th Cir.1989) (table)("Heathcoat II "). In their initial brief before this court, the defendants argued that the district court erred in (1) holding ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT