Hedrick v. United States, 060821 FED4, 20-7036

Docket Nº20-7036
Opinion JudgePER CURIAM
Party NameROBERT L. HEDRICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DR. PATRICK CRAFT; OFFICER CUNNINGHAM; OFFICER CAMPBELL; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER STANCIL; SIS OFFICER CONYER; A. W. RUPSKA, Defendants - Appellees.
AttorneyRobert L. Hedrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Judge PanelBefore GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Case DateJune 08, 2021
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals, United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)

ROBERT L. HEDRICK, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DR. PATRICK CRAFT; OFFICER CUNNINGHAM; OFFICER CAMPBELL; OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER STANCIL; SIS OFFICER CONYER; A. W. RUPSKA, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 20-7036

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

June 8, 2021

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 21, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. 5:19-ct-03302-BO Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.

Robert L. Hedrick, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Robert L. Hedrick appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hedrick v. United States, No. 5:19-ct-03302-BO (E.D. N.C. June 26, 2020). We grant in part and deny in part Hedrick's motion to seal (ECF No. 6), by sealing his declaration filed at ECF No. 11, but otherwise denying the motion to seal. See 4th Cir. R. 25(c)(2)(A)(iii). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

To continue reading

Request your trial