Heffner v. Ketchen, 5695
Decision Date | 02 March 1931 |
Docket Number | 5695 |
Citation | 50 Idaho 435,296 P. 768 |
Parties | LEONARD HEFFNER and SUSIE HEFFNER, Appellants, v. JANET A. KETCHEN, Treasurer and Ex-officio Tax Collector of Ada County, Idaho, CHARLES A. RIDDLE et al., as the Board of County Commissioners of Ada County, Idaho, and E. E. LISTER et al., as Commissioners of Drainage District No. 2 of the County of Ada, in the State of Idaho, Respondents |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
TAXATION-DRAINAGE DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS.
1. Drainage district assessments are not "taxes" within usual meaning of Constitution and statutes, and do not fall within constitutional restraints (Const., art. 7, sec 5).
2. Drainage district assessments are special assessments for local benefits, and in general sense are "taxes."
3. School district taxes and drainage district assessments held "taxes" within statute imposing tax liens on lands conveyed to county by tax deed (C. S., sec. 3241, and sec 3263 Laws 1921, chap. 232, sec. 2).
4. School district taxes and drainage district assessments held "taxes" within statute whereby sale by county of land acquired through tax deed passes title unincumbered by subsequent tax liens (C. S., sec. 3423, Laws 1929, chap. 216).
APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for Ada County. Hon. Dana E. Brinck, Judge.
Action to enjoin tax deed and quiet title against taxes. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.
Reversed and remanded with instructions. Costs to appellants.
T. L Martin, for Appellants.
State taxes, by the Constitution, and county taxes, by legislative declaration, are prior to special assessments. (Bosworth v. Anderson, 47 Idaho 697, 65 A. L. R. 1372, 280 P. 227.)
Assessments of Drainage District No. 2 are not taxes within the meaning of that term as it is usually employed in our Constitution and statutes. (Booth v. Clark, 42 Idaho 284, 244 P. 1099.)
When Ada county sold the property under consideration and conveyed same, title vested in the purchaser free of all taxes levied subsequent to 1924, the year of the delinquency upon which the tax deed to the county is based. (Chap. 159, 1927 Sess. Laws, p. 212.)
Carl A. Burke and Charles F. Reddoch, for Respondents.
The county acquires no vested right in property by virtue of a tax deed, and its purchase goes no further than to perpetuate the lien of the tax and is in aid of its collection. (Washington County v. Paradis, 38 Idaho 364, 222 P. 775.)
Under the statute of this state and the decisions of this court the title acquired by the county was subject to special assessments levied after the year of delinquency upon which the tax deed was issued. (C. S., sec. 3263, as amended by chap. 232, 1921 Sess. Laws, p. 520; Hunt v. City of St. Maries, 44 Idaho 700, 260 P. 155; Bosworth v. Anderson, 47 Idaho 697, 65 A. L. R. 1372, 280 P. 227; Seattle v. Everett, 125 Wash. 39, 215 P. 337.)
It is only by virtue of legislative action, that in the event of a sale of property acquired by the county through a tax deed, the lien of taxes assessed subsequent to the delinquency upon which the deed was issued to the county is canceled or eliminated. (C. S., sec. 3423, as amended by chap. 216; 1929 Sess. Laws, pp. 435-437.)
This case involves the construction of statutes relating to the sale of real property by a county. There is no dispute as to the facts.
Appellants are the owners of the land upon which the taxes hereinafter mentioned were levied, and brought this action against the Treasurer and Ex-officio Tax Collector of Ada County, the County Commissioners of said county, and the Commissioners of Drainage District No. 2 of Ada County, the land involved being situate in said drainage district. The purpose of the action was to have the taxes, including said drainage district assessments for the years 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928 and 1929, declared not to be a lien upon appellants' lands; that the defendant Treasurer be enjoined from issuing a tax deed for delinquencies for the years 1926 and 1927, or the other years mentioned; that it be adjudged that when the property was conveyed by Ada County to Albert Heffner (immediate grantors of plaintiffs, Leonard and Susie Heffner) the title vested free of all liens "of taxes and assessments which had been levied against said property subsequent to the 5th day of January, 1925, and that title be quieted in appellants, etc."
Ada County and its officers defaulted and the cause was heard upon the answer of the Commissioners of Drainage District No. 2, resulting in findings and decree in favor of said defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
The following taxes and assessments were levied against the property now owned by the Heffners for the year 1924, to wit:
Assessments
226.00
Total
These taxes became delinquent in December, 1924. There was no redemption and tax deed issued to Ada County on January 12, 1929. Thereafter, Ada County sold said property at public auction to Albert Heffner for $ 466.12 and conveyed the same to him by deed. Said Albert Heffner in turn conveyed the land to appellants, Leonard and Susie Heffner. The published notice of sale contained the following statement, viz.: "Said sale made subject to all special taxes." As no claim of prejudice is urged on account thereof we shall not consider any bearing this statement might otherwise have on the matters in issue here.
All of the taxing units heretofore mentioned continued to levy taxes and assessments against the property for the years 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, and Drainage District No. 2 alone levying for the year 1929. When the county received its tax deed in January, 1929, all state, county and school district taxes for the years 1928 to 1929, both inclusive, were canceled by order of the Board of County Commissioners of Ada County, leaving the delinquent drainage district assessments, uncanceled and unpaid, as follows:
Year
Certificate No.
Date
Amount
1925
7363
January 4, 1926
$ 197.98
1926
7593
January 3, 1927
188.73
1927
7873
January 2, 1928
233.94
1928
7709
January 7, 1929
244.87
1929
7717
January 6, 1930
On September 16, 1930, the County Treasurer published notice that unless the delinquent taxes and assessments for the years 1926 and 1927 were paid on or before January 3, 1931 respectively, she would issue tax deed to Ada County for the property.
The questions presented by this appeal are dependent for their solution upon the construction of two sections of our code, one relating to tax deed to the county, the other relating to deeds from the county, and which, so far as material to the issues here, read as follows:
C. S., sec. 3263, Sess. Laws 1921, chap. 232:
C. S., sec. 3423, Sess. Laws 1929, chap. 216:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Idaho Gold Dredging Company v. Balderston
... ... 250, 4 P.2d 893, 84 A. L. R. 820; Smallwood v. Jeter, ... supra ; Heffner v. Ketchen, 50 Idaho ... 435, 296 P. 768; In re Kessler, supra .) ... Appellant's ... ...
-
Dunaway v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, No. 10542–03.
...tax is one of enlargement, not of limitation), revd. on other grounds 474 U.S. 9, 106 S.Ct. 289, 88 L.Ed.2d 9 (1985); Heffner v. Ketchen, 50 Idaho 435, 296 P. 768, 770 (Idaho 1931) (the word “including” used in an Idaho tax lien statute is generally a term of enlargement, may be used as a w......
-
Smith v. City of Nampa, 409
...C. J. 1314, sec: 1839; Pennsylvania Co. v. City of Tacoma, 36 Wash. 656, 79 P. 306; State v. Jeffries, 83 Mont. 111, 270 P. 638; Heffner v. Ketchen, supra.) & Stout, R. B. Scatterday, Karl Paine, Maurice H. Greene and Cleve Grome, Amici Curiae. It is beyond the constitutional power of the l......
-
Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.
... ... Laws 1921; C. S., sec. 3423, as amended by chap. 216, Sess ... Laws 1929; Heffner v. Ketchen, 50 Idaho 435, 296 P ... 768; 26 R. C. L. 402.) ... Under ... the ... ...