Heft v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.

• Decision Date: 25 May 2012
• Docket Number: CASE NO. 2:11-CV-103
• Citation: Heft v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst., CASE NO. 2:11-CV-103 (S.D. Ohio May 25, 2012)
• Parties: BRIAN L. HEFT, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio

BRIAN L. HEFT, Petitioner,

v.WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-103

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

May 25, 2012

Judge Frost

Magistrate Judge King

ORDER and

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner¹ brings this action for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the Court on the Petition, Doc. No. 1, Respondent's Return of Writ, Doc. No. 16, Petitioner's Traverse, Doc. No. 30, and the exhibits of the parties. For the reasons that follow, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED.

Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing, Doc. No. 35, is DENIED. His motions to supplement the record, Doc. Nos. 29, 36, are DENIED. Petitioner's motion to withdraw certain claims from his habeas corpus petition, Doc. No. 43, is GRANTED.

FACTS and PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Ohio Third District Court of Appeals summarized the facts and procedural history of this case as follows:

In September 2007, the Logan County Grand Jury indicted Heft on Count One: rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), a felony of the first degree; Count Two: rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), a felony of the first degree; Count Three: sexual battery in violation ofR.C. 2907.03(A)(5), a felony of the third degree; Count Four: sexual battery in violation of R.C. 2907.03(A)(5), a felony of the third degree; Count Five: gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4), a felony of the third degree; and, Counts Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, and Ten: gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(1), all felonies of the fourth degree. The indictment stemmed from a multiple year course of conduct during which Heft allegedly sexually abused his stepdaughter, S.W.

In December 2007, Heft waived his speedy trial rights. Additionally, Heft filed a motion to continue the jury trial, which had been scheduled for January 8, 2008 [FN1] on the basis that he required additional time to prepare for trial. Thereafter, the trial court vacated the trial date of January 8, 2008, and rescheduled the date to February 21, 2008.

FN1. Heft's motion stated that the trial was scheduled for January 8, 2007; however, the year was clearly a typographical error, given that the motion was filed in December 2007.

In February 2008, Heft filed a motion to vacate the trial date of February 21, 2008, on the basis that he again required additional time to prepare for trial. Additionally, Heft reiterated that he waived his right to have the case tried within the statutory period. Thereafter, the trial court vacated the trial date of February 21, 2008, and rescheduled the date to April 29, 2008.

In April 2008, the State moved the trial court for an order pursuant to Crim.R. 7(D) to amend the indictment to include in each charge the culpable mental state.

In May 2008, the trial court overruled the State's motion to amend the indictment, and dismissed the September 2007 indictment without prejudice.

In July 2008, the Logan County Grand Jury indicted Heft on Count One: rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(a)(2), a felony of the first degree; Count Two: sexual battery in violation of R.C. 2907.03(A)(5), a felony of the third degree; Count Three: gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(1), a felony of the fourth degree; and, Count Four: gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(1), a felony of the fourth degree. Thereafter, Heft entered a plea of not guilty to all counts in the indictment.

In August 2008, Heft filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis that the State had violated his speedy trial rights, and that the speedy trial waivers he had filed in conjunction with the September 2007 indictment did not apply to the July 2008 indictment.

In September 2008, the trial court overruled Heft's motion to dismiss, finding that, unlike a speedy trial waiver, periods of delay resulting from motions filed by the defendant in a previous case also apply in a subsequent case based on the same underlying facts and circumstances.

In October 2008, Heft filed a motion to vacate the trial date of October 28, 2008, which the trial court granted, assigning the matter for jury trial on February 18, 2009.

In February 2009, the case proceeded to jury trial, at which the following testimony was heard.

Officer Andrew Kennedy of the Bellefontaine Police Department testified that, on July 23, 2007, he spoke to S.W. at the police department; that S.W. was accompanied by her friend, Victoria Early, and her friend's mother, Bridget Early; that it was very difficult for S.W. to speak and she was emotional; and, that S.W. alleged that she had been sexually abused by Heft, and detailed multiple specific incidents of sexual abuse.

Victoria Early testified that she had been close friends with S.W. for about five years at the time of the trial; that she observed S.W. and Heft interact as stepparent and stepdaughter on many occasions; that she did not believe Heft was as encouraging as a father figure should be; that Heft made negative comments to S.W. about her weight and appearance; that Heft also had a negative attitude regarding S.W.'s boyfriends; that Heft was rude to S.W.'s boyfriend and called him names; that S.W.'s role in the household was uncommon because she often cooked, cleaned, and looked after her younger brother; that she believed S.W. had taken on this role because S.W.'s mother, Bridget Heft, had health issues; that she observed that Bridget Heft spent most of the day watching television and drinking alcoholic beverages, and that she did not really clean; and, that, from her observations, she believed Heft and Bridget had more of a friendship than a marriage.

Early continued that, on the third Thursday of July in 2007, S.W. called her and asked her to pick her up; that S.W. was very distressed and upset; that S.W. came out of the house carrying her workclothing, but nothing else; that S.W. stayed at the Earlys' home from Thursday until Sunday; that she thought it was strange that S.W. brought no other clothing with her; that, when she arrived home from work at approximately 7:00 a.m., she and her mother watched a movie about a young woman being raped and then testifying in court; that S.W. awoke and came down to watch the movie; that S.W. appeared upset during the movie, but that did not surprise her because "she had been upset pretty much the whole weekend" (trial tr., p. 120); that, after the movie ended, S.W. began crying, told her and her mother that she had something she needed to tell them, and said that she could never go back home; that her mother called S .W.'s older brother, Nick, to pick her up; that she and her mother then accompanied S.W. to the police station, where police officers interviewed S.W.; that she never witnessed any sexual acts between Heft and S.W. or heard S.W. make such accusations in the past; and, that the Heft family was always pleasant to her when she was at their home.

Detective Scott Sebring of the Bellefontaine Police Department testified that, through his training, he was aware that many child victims of sexual abuse delay disclosure due to fear of not being believed, fear of discipline, fear of financial difficulty if the perpetrator is the primary financial support of the family, and fear of breaking up the family; that he interviewed Heft after he was arrested; that Heft denied the allegations; that he also interviewed Bridget Heft, who told him that she did not know anything about the allegations and that S.W. had never made such allegations to her; that, although S.W. had told him that her step-grandmother who lived with the family was suspicious of Heft, he did not interview the step-grandmother; that he did not examine either the Heft family's prior or current residence for DNA evidence; that he did not believe he would find any forensic evidence in the Hefts' household because it was clean and well-kept; and, that he did not examine any computers in the household because there was no indication that anything relevant would be contained on a computer.

S.W. testified that, throughout her childhood, she lived in a household with her stepfather, Heft, her mother, Bridget Heft, her younger brother, Shawn, her older brother, Nick, and intermittently her step-grandmother, Beatrice; that Heft and her mother married when she was two years old, and he was the only father figure she had known; that the family resided on Reservoir Road in Bellefontaine between the dates of January 19, 2001, and June 3, 2004; that the family resided on Highview Drive in Bellefontainebetween the dates of June 3, 2004, and July 23, 2007; that Heft was the primary financial provider for the family because her mother did not work, although she received social security payments; that her mother suffered multiple strokes and required brain surgery prior to the family moving to Bellefontaine in 2001; that her mother's stroke changed the dynamics of the household because she could no longer take care of the children due to speech problems and difficulties with her hand; that she did whatever she could to help take care of her younger brother and clean; that she rarely saw Heft and her mother together; that her mother watched television often and would drink several cans of beer per night; that her mother would consume alcohol to the point that she would stumble and nearly fall; and, that she did not believe it was the stroke that caused her mother to lose her balance.

S.W. continued that she did not get along well with Heft; that Heft sexually abused her when the family lived at both the Reservoir Road and Highview Drive residences; that, on Christmas Eve in 2001 or 2002, when the family lived on Reservoir Road, Heft had stayed up at night to cook a turkey; that Heft came into her room that night and summoned her to the door; that she went over to the door, and Heft pulled her pants and underwear down; that Heft attempted to kiss her near

...