Heiland v. Ertel

Decision Date01 February 1896
Docket Number68
Citation44 P. 1005,4 Kan.App. 516
PartiesERNEST HEILAND v. ALBERT ERTEL et al
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Opinion Filed May 12, 1896.

MEMORANDUM.--Error from Ford district court; A. J. ABBOTT judge. Action by Ernest Heiland against Albert and Mary A Ertel to compel the specific performance of a contract. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings the case to this court. Affirmed. The opinion herein, filed May 12, 1896 states the material facts.

Judgment affirmed.

M. W. Sutton, for plaintiff in error.

F. Dumont Smith, for defendants in error.

JOHNSON P. J. All the Judges concurring.

OPINION

JOHNSON, P. J.:

This action was brought by Ernest Heiland in the district court of Ford county against Albert Ertel and Mary A. Ertel to compel the specific performance of an alleged contract for sale and conveyance of a certain quarter-section of land situated in Ford county. The defendants demurred to the plaintiff's petition upon the ground that the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them, which demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff electing to stand on his petition, judgment was rendered for defendants, and plaintiff brings the case here for review.

It is alleged in the plaintiff's petition in the court below that on the 18th day of September, 1890, and prior thereto, Albert Ertel was the owner of the southwest quarter of section 27, in township 26, of range 21 west of the sixth principal meridian, situated in Ford county, Kansas, and Mary A. Ertel is the wife of Albert Ertel; that the Edwards County Bank, of Kinsley, was the agent of the defendants at that time for the purpose of selling said lands; that at that time defendants agreed in writing, by their certain deed and letters, to sell and convey said land to the plaintiff for the sum of $ 400; that the contract for the purchase and sale of this land is embodied in the following letters and a certain deed attached to plaintiff's petition as exhibits, and form a part of his petition:

"EXHIBIT A.

"SHELBINA, Shelby Co., Mo., Sept. 13, 1890.

"DEAR SIR: I seat myself to write you a few lines in order to let you know that we have the right of selling my own land, not John. If you don't believe me, go to Dodge City and see, and if you want the land you can have it for the offer made John, if you can, send us our 200 right away, for we are about to buy a piece over here, and we want to know right away so we know what to do; if you can send me the money or not. I want to know what you are going to do about it as soon as you get this. You will find out where the deeds is what we made for August Hessman; in the Edwards Kinsley Bank is where the deed were sent to. They said they was going to send the deeds back as soon as they laid their hands on it, so you will let me know what you are going to do about it soon -- what you are going to do. Write soon and send me John's letter, for he says he didn't know why you wrote to him to buy it, for he didn't know what you wanted to write to him for. He gave me the letter you wrote him. So I want you to write as soon as you get this. So I will close for this time.

Frown your friend, A. ERTEL.

"To Mr. Helland."

"EXHIBIT B.

"SHELBINA, Shelby Co., Mo., September 23.

"Dear Friend Heiland: I received your letter yesterday, and was glad to hear you was well. This leaves us all well. Well, Mr. Heiland, you can go to Kinsley and see if the deeds are out there yet, and if they are you can get them and let me know, and you get all the money for the place all the better for me. I have got till the 15th of October, that is all the time I have got on the place I have in view, and if you get the deeds you can have the deeds made out for 400 and send to me, and we will sign them and then you can leave them in the land agent's hands out there, the one you got his name, till I get all of my money, and you pay the taxes for this year, for I am just giving the place away anyhow. I will write to Kinsley and tell them to give you the deed and tell them if they have misplaced them they can stand good for them or you get them. You can send to the Mashel Bank in Shelbina anyway to make it safe for us both, and I want to know just what I can do by the tenth of next month, so I can fix this place out here safe. I don't lose it of course if I wait till April for the other $ 200. I will have to have interest on the money, for I will have to pay interest on what I borrow; so let me know all about your arrangements, so I can make mine out here, and see about this deeds. I am out now on that piece of land $ 350, so you see I ain't making much on it, so I will close. Hoping to hear from you soon and just what you can do, so write soon. From your friend, ALBERT ERTEL."

"EXHIBIT C.

"The grantors, Albert Ertel and Mary Erte1, his wife, of the county of Adams and state of Illinois, for and in consideration of $ 450 in hand paid, convey and warrant to August Hessman, of the county of Ford and state of Kansas, the following-described real estate: The southwest quarter of section No. 27, in township No. 26 south, of range No. 21 west, situated in the county of Ford, in the state of Kansas, hereby releasing and waiving all right under and by virtue of the homestead-exemption laws of this state.

"Dated this 19th day of March, A. D. 1890.

ALBERT ERTEL.

MARY ANN ERTEL.

"Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of--"

"State of Illinois, County of Adams, ss.

"I, George W. Cyrus, a notary public in and for said county and state, do hereby certify that Albert Ertel and Mary A. Ertel, his wife, who are personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument as having executed the same, appeared before me this day in person, and acknowledged that they signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument, including the release and waiver of the right of homestead, as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth.

"Given under my hand and notarial seal, this 19th day of March, 1890.

[L. S.] GEORGE W. CYRUS, Notary Public."

"My commission expires September 20, 1892."

"EXHIBIT D.

"SHELBINA, Shelby Co., Mo., Sept. 23, 1890.

"DEAR SIR: I take my pen in hand to inform you that I have been informed that my deeds is there made out for August Hessman, and if they are you can let Ernest Heiland have them, as Hessman backed out and Heiland had bought, and he will call for them. If he don't call for them in 10 days you will send them to Shelbina, Shelby county, Missouri. Everything is there, deeds and tax receipt, too; so please let me know all about them as soon as you can, so I remain, yours truly.

MR. ALBERT ERTEL.

"It has been 10 or 11 years since I was out there. How is business out there, Mr. Edwards?"

"EXHIBIT E.

"SHELBINA Shelby Co., Mo., Sept. 27, 1890.

"MY DEAR SIR: I seat myself to ask you if no one has n't got my deeds. Please send them to me unless they will give $ 500 for them. If any one will leave $ 500 is there and let me know I will make a deed to that effect. If you have my deeds please send them all to me to (Shelbina, Shelby county, Mo.) as soon as you get this. If I can't get that I will keep it a year longer yet. I received a letter last night saying they would leave $ 400 in the bank, but I do n't understand it; it seems as if Joseph Holtfrench is the way it was wrote, but the letter come from Camp Point, Ill., and it stated that we could send my contract to the Edwards County Bank. If there is such a man saying anything, tell him he can have it for $ 500 cash....

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Leaf v. Codd
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 12, 1925
    ...90 Ill. 525, 32 Am. Rep. 35; Gilbert v. Baxter, 71 Iowa 327, 32 N.W. 364; Greenawalt v. Este, 40 Kan. 418, 19 P. 803; Heiland v. Ertel, 4 Kan. App. 516, 44 P. 1005; Phelps v. Good, 15 Idaho 76, 96 P. 216; v. Hobart, 22 Idaho 735, 127 P. 997, 43 L. R. A., N. S., 410; 9 Cyc. 245; DeJonge v. H......
  • Sharpless v. The J. B. Kirk Gas and Smelting Company and J. B. Kirk
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • October 5, 1929
    ... ... an executory contract consists of mutual promises both ... parties must be bound, or it will be void for want of ... mutuality." (Heiland v. Ertel, 4 Kan.App ... 516.) See, also, Woolsey v. Ryan, 59 Kan. 601, 54 P ... 664; Railway Co. v. Bagley, 60 Kan. 424, 56 P. 759; ... Van ... ...
  • The Atchison v. Crittenden
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • February 1, 1896

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT