Heldt v. STATE OF SD-BROOKINGS COUNTY

Decision Date07 January 1982
Docket NumberAdv. No. 481-0228.,Bankruptcy No. 481-00132
Citation17 BR 519
PartiesDavid Andrew HELDT and Janice K. Heldt v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA—BROOKINGS COUNTY.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of South Dakota

Clair R. Gerry, Stuart & Gerry, Sioux Falls, S.D., for plaintiff.

Richard D. Casey, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, S.D., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PEDER K. ECKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

It is the Court's understanding the parties are in the midst of a dischargeability of debt dispute under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)(A). In regard to counsel's letters of December 22 and 28, 1981, the Court perceives the issue to be resolved is:

Whether Section 2334 of Public Law 97-35, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, which amends 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)(A) to make debts which are child support obligations assigned to a state under Section 402(a)(26) of the Social Security Act nondischargeable in bankruptcy applies retrospectively to a bankruptcy petition filed prior to the effective date of the Amendment.
FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Debtor filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 on June 15, 1981.

2. The effective date of Section 2334 of Public Law 97-35, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, is August 13, 1981.

3. The filing date of Debtors' Complaint is October 16, 1981.

4. Debtor Janice K. Heldt assigned her rights to the collection of child support arrearages due from Debtor David Heldt to the State of South Dakota pursuant to Section 402(a)(26). The amount of the arrearages is approximately $6,524.75 plus costs and interest.

5. Debtors were divorced but are now remarried.

6. Prior to August 13, 1981, 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)(A) provided:

"(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt—
. . . .
(5) to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor, for alimony to, maintenance for, or support of such spouse or child, in connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree, or property settlement agreement, but not to the extent that—
(A) such debt is assigned to another entity, voluntarily, by operation of law, or otherwise; or. . . . "

7. Section 2334 of Public Law 97-35, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, provides:

                "PUBLIC LAW 97-35 —                    95 STAT. 863
                AUG. 13, 1981
                CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS
                NOT DISCHARGED
                BY BANKRUPTCY
                SEC. 2334. (a) Section 456 of          42 U.S.C. § 656
                the Social Security Act is amended
                by adding at the end thereof
                the following new subsection
                (b) "A debt which is a child           42 U.S.C. § 602
                support obligation assigned to a
                State under section 402(a)(26) is
                not released by a discharge in
                bankruptcy under title 11, United
                States Code."
                (b) Section 523(a)(5)(A) of
                title 11, United States Code, is
                amended by inserting before the
                semicolon the following: "(other
                than debts assigned pursuant to
                section 402(a)(26) of the Social
                Security Act)".
                (c) The amendments made by Effective date.
                this section shall become effective    42 U.S.C. § 656 note."
                on the date of the enactment
                of this Act.
                 

DEBTORS' ARGUMENT

The dischargeability of the debt is not governed by Section 2334 of Public Law 97-35, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, because this law only affects those petitions filed after the effective date of August 13, 1981.

CREDITOR'S ARGUMENT

The debt owed by Debtors to Creditor is not dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5)(A) as amended by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 because Debtors' Complaint was filed after the effective date of the amendment to the statute.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT