Helen Mining Co v. Elliott

Docket Number16-1058
Decision Date14 June 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
23 cases
  • Belt v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 15 d4 Agosto d4 2019
    ...question at issue, our ... analysis is complete ... and Congress's unambiguously expressed intent controls." Helen Mining Co. v. Elliott , 859 F.3d 226, 234 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , 467 U.S. 837, 842-43, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.E......
  • Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nursing
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 29 d2 Agosto d2 2017
    ...at issue, our Chevron analysis is complete at Step One, and Congress's unambiguously expressed intent controls." Helen Mining Co. v. Elliott , 859 F.3d 226, 234 (3d Cir. 2017)."[I]f the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue," we move to the second step of the inq......
  • Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp., BRB 18-0609
    • United States
    • Longshore Complaints Court of Appeals
    • 7 d1 Dezembro d1 2020
    ...impairment to be rated using "the most currently revised edition" of the AMA Guides. See generally Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843-844; Helen Mining, 859 F.3d at 234. see no way to interpret this language as a mandate to use the version in effect at the time of Claimant's injury. See Kisor v. Wilk......
  • Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp.
    • United States
    • Longshore Complaints Court of Appeals
    • 7 d1 Dezembro d1 2020
    ...statute.[12] Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 843-844 (1984); Helen Mining Co. v. Elliott, 859 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. 2017); Belt v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc., 401 F.Supp.3d 512, 527 (E.D. Pa. 2019). "If Congress has explicitly left a gap for t......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT