Heller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10679.
| Decision Date | 27 January 1945 |
| Docket Number | No. 10679.,10679. |
| Citation | 147 F.2d 376 |
| Parties | HELLER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HELLER. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Samuel S. Stevens, Lloyd W. Dinkelspiel, and Victor E. Cappa, all of San Francisco, Cal., for taxpayer.
Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, Harold C. Wilkenfeld, and Helen Goodner, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the Commissioner.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
On order of this court, the proceedings on the petition of Walter S. Heller, taxpayer, and the petition of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for review of the decision of the Tax Court are consolidated.
The question raised by the petition of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is whether attorney's fees paid by the taxpayer in connection with litigation for the cash value of shares of stock were allowable as a deduction from gross income. The Tax Court found they were.
The Commissioner contends these fees were incurred in a matter pertaining to assets of a purely capital nature and were therefore a capital expenditure and not deductible.
The facts are stipulated. During the year 1937, a merger of Associated Oil Company into the Tidewater Oil Company was under way. The taxpayer and several other stockholders refused to accept Tidewater stock in exchange for their stock in Associated Oil. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 369 of the California Civil Code, suit was commenced for the cash value of Associated Oil stock. The attorney's fees in question were incurred in the prosecution of this litigation. The amount of $2,145 was deducted as attorney's fees in the 1937 tax return. The Tax Court in its findings of fact found that in this litigation the taxpayer was not defending or asserting his title. He had title and was then concerned with receiving the cash value of his shares of stock and in the determination of the amount due. This litigation, the Tax Court said, was concerned with the production of income or collection of income in connection with the management of property held for the production of income. The law states that expenses may be deducted where they have been paid during the taxable year for the production or collection of income or for the management, conservation or maintenance of property held for the production of income. The decision of the Tax Court on this question turns upon its findings of fact, and there is no reversible error here.
The second question for review, the question raised by the taxpayer's petition, is whether or not the reorganization of Heller, Bruce & Company, a Delaware corporation, was a tax-free reorganization within the provisions of Section 112(b)(3) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 112(b)(3). The Tax Court held that it was.
On January 1, 1927, Heller, Bruce & Company was duly incorporated pursuant to the law of the State of Delaware. Said Delaware corporation issued its stock in exchange for the assets of a partnership previously conducted in California under the same firm name. The exchange of the stock for the assets of the partnership was a non-taxable exchange. The Delaware corporation's officers and directors were the former partners and their employee. The Delaware corporation engaged in the same investment banking business and had the same office which said partnership had had. At all times the principal officers of the Delaware corporation were Walter S. Heller, president, Harry A. Bruce, vice-president, and Edith C. French, secretary and treasurer. On December 6, 1937, Heller Bruce and Company was organized under the laws of California. The minutes of the first meeting of the Board of Directors of the California corporation show that the President announced that the California corporation had been organized to acquire and carry on the business of the Delaware corporation. On ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ingalls v. Patterson
...F.2d 906; Frank v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. 511; Garrett v. Crenshaw, 4 Cir., 196 F.2d 185; Heller v. Commissioner, 2 T.C. 371, affirmed 9 Cir., 147 F.2d 376; Helvering v. Independent Life Ins. Co., 292 U.S. 371, 54 S.Ct. 758, 78 L.Ed. 1311; Helvering v. Winmill, 305 U.S. 79, 59 S.Ct. 45, 83 L......
-
Ruoff v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...of property, held for the production of income, * * * 6. Cf. Straub v. Granger, 143 F.Supp. 250 (W.D.Pa., 1956), and Heller v. Commissioner, 147 F.2d 376, affirming 2 T.C. 371, which cases are factually dissimilar to the instant case but allow the claimed deductions as being ‘conservatory’ ......
-
Spangler v. CIR
...Oil Co. v. Burnet, 55 F.2d 17, 26 (9th Cir., 1932). Cf. Vincent v. Commissioner, 219 F.2d 228 (9th Cir., 1955); Heller v. Commissioner, 147 F.2d 376 (9th Cir., 1945). Some courts have reached the same result by reading the language of § 23(a) (2) and § 212 ("production or collection of inco......
-
Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
...stockholder who was seeking to recover the cash value of the stock of a corporation merged with another corporation, Heller v. C. I. R., 9 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 376, the facts complied with these tests. But here, the two "agreeing" partners and the taxpayer, who was the "dissident" partner, ......