Helms v. State, 4 Div. 30.
| Decision Date | 29 June 1948 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 30. |
| Citation | 37 So.2d 229,34 Ala.App. 82 |
| Parties | HELMS v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied Aug. 3, 1948.
Douglas Brown, of Ozark, Lawrence K. Andrews, of Union Springs, and J. W. Hicks, of Enterprise, for appellant.
A A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Hugh F. Culverhouse, Asst Atty. Gen., for the State.
This appellant was indicted for and by a jury found guilty of assault with intent to murder.
The alleged offense grew out of the pistol shooting of Cy English by appellant.
A reading of the record convinces us that the evidence presented by the state, if believed by the jury under the required rule, was sufficient to support the judgment and verdict herein rendered.
This cause must however be reversed because of the ruling of the court in connection with certain questions propounded by the solicitor to this appellant on cross examination.
Testifying in his own behalf in the trial below the appellant stated that his left arm was crippled to the extent he could not bend the elbow or close the hand, and that he had little use of it. This arm was in the same condition on the day of this difficulty, as it was on the day of the trial. The defendant exhibited his arm to the jury.
It was well within the province of the appellant to show his physical condition on the day of the difficulty, as such testimony sheds light on the issues involved and is competent and relevant. Lambert v. State, 208 Ala. 42, 93 So 708.
On cross examination of the appellant the record shows the following:
'Q. You say you have got a crippled arm? A. Yes, sir.
'Q. Would you mind telling the jury how you happened to have it? A. This crippled arm----
'Mr. Brown: We object to that.
'The Court: Overrule the objection. He has exhibited his wound to the jury.
'Mr. Brown: We except.
'Q. I will ask you if you didn't get it in a difficulty in which you killed a woman?
'Mr. Brown: We object to the question.
'The Court: Overrule the objection.
'Mr. Brown: Save the exception.
'The Court: Did you or not? You heard the question. 'A. I was on the sheriff's force.
'Mr. Brown: We move to exclude the answer.
'The Court: Overrule the motion.
'Mr. Brown: Save the exception.'
Ordinarily a general objection without assigned grounds is unavailing. However when the evidence sought is on its face irrelevant and illegal, or inadmissible under any circumstances, and obnoxious to all rules of evidence, a general objection may be sufficient. Gabriel v. State, 40 Ala. 357; Downey v. State, 115 Ala. 108, 22 So. 479; Hale v. State, 20 Ala.App. 270, 101 So. 774. See also 6 Ala.Dig., Criminal Law, k695(2) for numerous cases enunciating above principles.
The question objected to goes into a former difficulty between this appellant and a stranger to this case which is in nowise a part of the res gestae of this case. It tends somewhat to detail this other difficulty. Certainly the question...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Echols v. State
...250 Ala. 396, 34 So.2d 614; Corsbie v. Poore, 29 Ala.App. 487, 198 So. 268; certiorari denied 240 Ala. 207, 198 So. 272; Helms v. State, 34 Ala.App. 82, 37 So.2d 229; certiorari denied 251 Ala. 275, 37 So.2d 231; Rountree Farm Co. v. Morgan County, 249 Ala. 472, 31 So.2d 346; Slaughter v. G......
-
Satterwhite v. State
...the inquiry. Loyd v. State, 279 Ala. 447, 186 So.2d 731 (1966); Tanner v. State, 259 Ala. 306, 66 So.2d 836 (1953); Helms v. State, 34 Ala.App. 82, 37 So.2d 229 (1948). Thus, Satterwhite's general objection to the introduction of the affidavit, search warrant and return in the present case ......
-
Schaefer v. State
...to preserve error on review. However, when the evidence sought is manifestly illegal, a general objection is sufficient. Helms v. State, 34 Ala.App. 82, 37 So.2d 229, cert. denied 251 Ala. 275, 37 So.2d 231; Hale v. State, 20 Ala.App. 270, 101 So. 774, cert. denied Ex parte Hale, 212 Ala. 1......
-
Anderson v. State
...by a general objection. Rogers v. State, 34 Ala.App. 617, 42 So.2d 642 (1949) cert. denied, 252 Ala. 670, 42 So.2d 643. In Helms v. State, 34 Ala.App. 82, 37 So.2d 229, cert. denied 251 Ala. 275, 37 So.2d 231 (1948) the appellant was being tried for the crime of assault with intent to murde......